Calibrating Ratings

Admits the rating system is flawed

Asks for ratings

Relative comparisons via the ratings are only valid within the same metro area. Comparing different metro areas via the ratings is a fools errand. You have to develop a feel what is or isn't tolerated in a given area based on reading the descriptions. FWIW, at a lot of places, the experience also varies significantly between regular and not.

I ignore the number grades. One man's 9 is another man's 4. The value is in the description within the review. If it says, "I love this place because the girls have big fat asses," then I know to avoid it. Or vice versa, "The girls were way too skinny," I'll be paying a visit.

Some PL’s are either blind or have no taste

Yeah I guess the question is, where are ratings the most difficult to get? Who's got the hottest 7s. I'm looking for the standard white SC chick: white, petite, natural, some assets.

I don't even look at the rating numbers. I read the substance of the reviews to decide whether I might like the place. As a wild guess, I'd say 75% of the reviews I have read about clubs I've been to are generally accurate. The rest are by shills who don't know what they're talking about, or people who hit the place at a bad time or had a bad encounter. Pretty easy to ID the outliers when you look at a few reviews for a club. Also gives a good sense of the ethnicity and appearance of the dancers

fucking genius right here this hernando fella from Mexico city -

Instead of ratings, I always considered the numbers of reviews of a strip club here in Indiana to be a more accurate indicator of how good the club is. I think Brad's Brass Flamingo has always received the most total reviews for Indianapolis and really is the number one strip club here. When the top girl in a local club moves to another club it is usually up to Brad's.

The main exception to this is The Pony. The Pony was previously under a different owner and a different name and when it was sold and the name changed the old reviews were not carried over.

The calibration would have to be per-PL. We'd all have to rate the same women, whose nude pics are on the internet, on our profiles, to give others an idea of what our numbers mean. But that also isn't straight-forward. For example, Audree Jaymes is a solid 10 for me. But if someone else gave her a lower score, you wouldn't know if they prefer spinners or white women.

On second thought, what might be simpler would be to give several examples of women you think are 10s in your profile Make it diverse, the thinnest and the curviest woman you think is a 10. If you have a race preference, you could pick the hottest woman (if any) of your meh races, and give your score for her. But I won't be doing it, since I've always just described the dancers in reviews, with no numeric rating.

You can never solve this. Have to go based on, won’t suck!