Some faith in TUSCL reviewers restored

It took all of about 5 seconds to reject.

This is what PLs do after they’ve already masturbated 6 times, saved the princess in Legend of Zelda and had their Taco Bell for dinner. They still have an hour before lights out from mom and dad!

^ Not sure why the micropenile hostility over something that doesn't concern you.

Randomly posting an AI occasional review to test the Adjudicator is a good idea. I wonder how many are generated?

AI generated text has a certain sterility to it. When I read a review that starts with generalities and never gets into specifics, reads like an encyclopedia, written in third person, and sounds it was written by someone who never visited the club, or any other clubs for that matter, I run it through an AI text detector and accept or reject based on that.

I suppose it is just a matter of time before some one develops an AI app to “deAI” AI generated text.

@59 and @HarderLap, good on both of you.

AI might do some things decently well, but its club reviews are shit. They sound like bad Yelp reviews, referencing "adult entertainment," go into vague details on the club layout and furniture, are allergic to numbers, and never a dancer name nor the characteristics of dances and mileage.

Didn’t adjudicate this, but I rely on my internal AI detector. AI generated reviews are invariably otherwise deficient

So you attempted to undermine the credibility of this site by posting a fake AI generated review? And you plan to do it again?

Maybe @founder should ban you for that.

^ Or you completely missed the point.

I get the point about people approving bs AI reviews, but adding more bs AI reviews is not the answer.

Founder should ban anyone that submits AI reviews, even members doing it to try to prove a point.

^ 👍

^ OK you two, go to Founder and try to get me banned if you have such a weed up your asses about it.

I don’t want to get you or anyone else banned, but whodey does have a point. Touch grass before you speak.

^ I get your point but I didn't think this--which I said on another thread I'd do and was actually encouraged to do--would generate such drama queendom.

There you go with your smugness because I agree he has a point I’m a drama queen please stop being a child.

^ Many people are being overdramatic on this thread, like I violated some sacrosanct law and deserve to be burned at the stake for it.

Actually you in particular don't seem to get along with anyone here.

^ you’re right you’re a whiny little baby

^ Not getting off your lawn, gramps ;)

Yup, numbers (and them being correct) is what mainly distinguishes a real review fro ma fake review.

I don't trust the reviews. There are too many fake ones. Ones for clubs that are closed. You can only read about a club layout so many times....

If you submit the same review at a different time it could easily sail through based on which reviewers are "on shift" at that time.