Rejecting Reviews

Some times the submitter means well by posting that a club is closed. I reject it but make notes for him to post it on club discussions and submit an update to the club listing.

If the review is only about that guy's personal beef with one dancer.

Mostly I just reject short reviews. A review has to be pretty bad for me to hit the red button for some other reason. Normally if I'm on the fence I'll just pass on it (neither accept or reject).

"Mercedes gave me a BBBJ and FS for $200 plus room fee." Unless you're in a jurisdiction where it's legal.

"I came, saw 3 dancers, had a beer, and left." Put some effort and give real information.

"<begin> I'm just posting this so I can read other reviews! <end>" Yes I've seen this, contribute to the site via paying or reviewing, or get ghost.

If I were in town for a night, would this help me decide which club to hit up or not?

I briefly scroll the short reviews and reject any that lack real, useful, info. I want reviews that will help me decide whether to check out a club or not.

If someone writes about FS or a BJ I will reject as too explicit. You are just going to kill the golden goose. Why do you want that club closed down? There are other ways to say that a good time can be had.

My criterion is whether there is useful information. I can tolerate short if the info is valuable. I would approve the following.

"Went in at 3pm. One ugly girl on her phone. Another ugly girl on the stage ignoring the customers. That's all the girls there were. I left."

👽 Some People Just Wanna B Simple With The Reviews, So They Just State A Few Words.
Sometimes, There Isn't Enough Experience/Interaction With The Clubs For Longer Reviews & Sometimes People Don't Like To Write Much. On The Other Hand, We Must Look Out For Non - Legitimate Things, Or Things That Don't Match Up Properly With What They Are Saying, So Being "Business Minded" & Protecting The Integrity Of Business Is Important With Reviews - 🐦 🦢 🦢 🦅

I probably reject about 25% of the unpublished reviews that I read. Most of the time, the review is far too short and contains no useful information. On rare occasion, I'll reject a longer review because it is a word salad (you'd need a decoder ring to understand it) or because it is wordy but filledl with vague information and personal musings.

I very seldom reject a review for being too explicit because there are many areas of the country (e.g., Miami, Tampa, Providence, Detroit) where extras are openly discussed in the club. I do encourage reviewer to omit the name of a specific dancer when discussing extras.

I've also suggested that people add some information and resubmit. Most of the suggestions focus on describing the private dance facilities, costs and mileage. I do wonder how many people I've pissed off by rejecting a weak review. At least I typically make suggestions for how to improve a weak review, unless of course the submitted review is ridiculously short.

Lacking useful information, which often but not always means they are ridiculously short
I reject any reviews that tie named dancers to illegal acts, but I can’t think of one I rejected on that basis that didn’t get approved anyway

Whenever you see "me and my wife" "first time in a strip club" or "bachelor party" if you auto reject all that you would be right like 98% of the time.

I like the crowd sourced voting system. Even if I disagree with how people vote, they should have their say. We mostly get it right, though I think the new minimum criteria for a published review of 5/8 upvotes is too easy. I’d like to go back to the previous 5/7 votes.