If you use the "Discussions" link in the menu, all of the discussions that you can access (front room, individual clubs, politics, TJ,) are displayed in a single feed. Other restricted forums (dressing room, VIP, etc.) only display in that feed if you've qualified for access.
So, users regularly comment on discussions from clubs they never visit because it's all in that feed. Whether or not it should be or you like it is another topic.
I used to be a guy who named a lot of names, but I'm not on board with that anymore. It's partly because of the YMMV factor (especially when you're a known regular), but also because naming names can really wrap a dancer around an axle (sometimes even when extras are not associated with the name). Balancing that against the utility of using names, I choose to err on the side of caution in favor of the dancer's quality of life at work.
I actually like the dancers I see. I'm not in "love" or "catching feelings", but I want them to keep dancing for as long as we're both benefiting. So, I don't want to coax potentially bad customers towards them.
I also believe that it's possible to write a good review without treating listing dancers like dishes on a Chinese takeout menu. But that's my 2 cents.
If guys want to use names, that's still allowed here and I'm not going to give anyone grief over it. That is until you start connecting dancers by name to extras. Like a lot of guys here, I have strong and not favorable opinions about that practice.