Is dancer quality declining?
FONDL
As many of you know, I haven't been to a club in a couple of years. I seem to have lost interest to a large extent. There are probably a lot of reasons why, but one of them is that it was getting harder and harder for me to find dancers who appealed to me, while the number who didn't appeared to be growing. That seemed to be especially true in the smaller neghborhood-type clubs that I prefer. Is that just me getting too fussy in my old age, or just bad luck, or are others finding the same problem? Are most of the best girls moving to more upscale clubs, or are there just fewer of them out there? What's been your experience?
35 comments
I could make the same argument about pizza. I hadn't ordered any pizza from one outlet in over 2 years. It seemed like the quality of order out pizza was declining. The pizza place I didn't order from went out of business or closed down in my town. One important detail I left out of all of that was that a competitor pizza outlet had run a blitz of special pizza coupons all across town with people actually buying the coupon books to get pizzas from them at a much bigger than normal discount. Apparently they did enough damage to the competitor that it drove the competitor out of business. Oh well, similiar story but I have noticed some big strip clubs driving down the business at smaller strip clubs. The dancers go to where they can make the money at. I think of the Platinum Plus clubs in the strip club world as similiar to the Walmart store. They get lots of people and offer discounted dances and make big money in the process and destroy competitors in the process. The dancers and people stop visiting the dying businesses as much.
However if you like Walmart and saving money or the equivalent in the strip club business, it's good for the consumer. I have like an upscale version of Walmart in the strip club business. There are some very hot girls working but they like to charge more. They give me discounts because I'm a regular or repeat customer.
Casualguy, I've always thought that southern clubs had more attractive dancers. They tend to be more polite too, but then so does everyone else. That's pretty true of the Midwest too. Hope I don't offend anyone but it's always been my opinion that the further you get from from the Northeast (where I've always lived) the more civil people are. It's very noticable when you travel a lot. It's also very noticable with strippers, give me a sweet southern girl any day.
Sounds like you're asking for the world. <just teasing> I was at The Trap last night and not a single dancer met your requirements and there was a good number of dancers. :( Sometimes when the food supply changes, then your tastes need to change? NO!!!!! :)
I think even if you went to Tootsies which has hundreds of dancers you'd be lucky to find 3. The reason being is the focus seems to be on "sexy" and not cute at all. And, then the price goes to the stratosphere unless you don't think $25 for 3 minutes is strato land. And, I think for a lot of customers 3 minutes is more than enough time so it is a good deal or they make very excellent money and $25 for 3 minutes is reasonable or even cheap.
Over at Angels I saw a dancer who was just adorable in street clothes without makeup. She was still hot with all the garbage i.e. high heels, makeup, fancy outfit, etc., but I would have been a lot happier just getting her as she came in the door. She even acted better in street clothes--more natural and girlish. The club is just a little too upscale--concern with all types of flash, one of the negatives of inner city--even though it is a dive.
On the other hand, I think there is a natural tendency to overstate how bad it has become and to look back through rose colored glasses. For example, I suspect I am a lot less attracted than I used to be to "seasoned" pro-type strippers who may appear sexy at first glance: tanned with bleached hair, boob job, etc. As a newbie, I included them on the plus side, and they contribute to my memory of the overall quality, although I wouldn't count them as a plus today.
Also, I think it's misleading to base your assessment on the inability to find a replacement for an ATF. That says more about ones personal situation than overall dancer quality. In fact, I think it's folly to set out to look for another dancer who is like your ATF, but maybe that's a separate issue.
In my case and with my looks and at my age, ANY dancer can appeal to me!!
It doesn't take very much to please me, as well as Mr Happy! I'm just your normal 'strip club junky' looking for fun and excitement, whether 'extras' be available or not! JUST GET ME "HARD"!!! I wanna' make sure he still works occassionally!
Professor - Certain standards?? You mean I'm suppose to have standards? LOL
FONDL - Did you lose your ATF? If so, I'll try and help find her, for a finder's fee of course! LOL Ah yes, the massage therapist. Hmmm, now that I think of it, it's time I get back with mine!!! Been a whole week since the last one.
As far as 'general dancer quality', I believe it depends on the type club you visit. Henceforth, if you visit an upscale club, you find prettier dancers. This is not always the case, as locality and economic factors figure in. But, yes, it is easy to conceive that dancers' looks are diminishing.
How about some responses from our 'dancer' members???
Bones, the only standard I expect for you to have is the ability to recognize that "she is a she". I would hate for you to go through "Crying Games" experience... just kidding ! :)
Several years ago at one time at one no touch all air club, I do remember lots of hot 10's in the club. I even remember seeing a couple of 10's every once in a while in my local area. Now most dancers I see just look good but don't really get my heart pumping to any great degree unless they're getting a bit wild with me with some acrobatic stage tipping.
If you can, "...always find someone to be the star of the day anywhere...", then you have just not been to the right clubs. I would bet that all of us here, that frequent clubs, except maybe you, have visited at least one club that we couldn't get out of fast enough! Visit Florida, and I'll point out a couple for you.
http://www.archive.org/details/stripper_…
Jablake, whenever I've been to Brad's Brass, I'd say that about a third of the girls there met my criteria. But maybe that's why I think Brad's is the best club in the country.
Bones, you're welcome, for both the "thank you" and you're sincere offer to help. I'd tell you where my ATF is but you're WAY too horny for her. But if you're ever in the Tampa area and want to get the world's best NONSEXUAL massage, let me know.
Flint, MI (pop. about 125,000) -- TUSCL lists 9 clubs
How can a town this size support 9 clubs? Of course the talent pool is going to be diluted and dancer quality will be down. You will have to search for the good ones.
Kokomo, IN (pop. about 46,000) -- TUSCL lists 6 clubs
Kokomo has one great club and 5 shitty clubs. A town this size can only support one club. Of course the quality of the girls will be spread too thin.
Lansing, MI (pop. about 120,000) -- TUSCL lists 3 clubs
Lansing has roughly the same population has Flint, yet only has one third the number of clubs. And in contrast to Flint, the talent in Lansing is pretty good.
I think the answer seems simple - until some of the under-performing clubs close their doors, there are too many opporunities for average looking dancers to find work.
it always puzzles me that some clubs may have 10 girls working one shift and almost no customers present. Forget about girls, but how can the club survive with little to no customer patronage? While we may think that some clubs should close thier doors and the natural selection should take its course, those clubs are still open. There are got to be some other forces at play.
It seems more difficult in getting BBBJs in the clubs nowadays! Oh shit, WRONG topic!!
I think my point was missed. I think the importance of this question is overrated. It might be true (in fact, I would say it is true for most places) that dancer quality is down from where it used to be, but as a person who goes to strip clubs occasionally, there are times when I go to a club and most of the dancers aren't worth my time, but there is usually somebody who is. Let's say I get a lapdance from this particular dancer. Now, to an individual patron at a specific moment in time, does it really matter whether the quality of the dancers is down from where it used to be, if you got a girl giving you a lapdance at that specific moment? I don't think so. Then again, maybe I demand less than everyone else here.
(Raspa, Robert F. and John Cusack 1990, Psychiatric Implications of Tattoos, American Family Physician. 41: p. 1483)
http://www.av1611.org/tattoos/rebel.html
It's everywhere. My original strip-clubbing experiences in the 1980s were all about getting surrounded by lithe, supple, young-looking girls who had a type of "runner's build" or "gym rat" physique. I just went in and was SURROUNDED by them. (Maybe I was at the right clubs?) Now I spend most of my strip-club time trying to FIND these girls among their co-workers. They used to be about 75%; now they're 5%.
If you don't prefer that type, or actively DISlike that type, then you would not necessarily say that dancer quality is declining, at least not on the basis of that evidence. But if that's what you're looking for, and you find it to be of ever decreasing supply, then by direct correlation the desirability of dancers is indeed declining.
If you're a tit man and just want huge woggly waggliness in giant descending mamms, no matter what kind of wiggly belly or cheezy thighs accompany them, then you'll probably not mind current "dancer" quality.
But I put "dancer" in quotes because to me, DANCING is a physical, and therefore exercise-oriented, activity. Those whom I observe dancing naked, I want to observe as able to dance, as somehow suited to the activity. Their nakedness, and their dancing, are things which should have some bearing on their body type. Woggly waggly hooters aren't for slapping around the barber pole and swinging around patrons' heads like water balloons ... ick.
Book Guy, I agree, average weight of dancers has increased a great deal. Whether you think that's good or bad is a matter of personal choice. I'm in your camp, dancing is an athletic endeavor and the girls doing it should look somewhat athletic.
I think a good number of customers are happier. They love blubber. A few have said it isn't that they love blubber it is that good looking women are too good for them. :)
http://www.archive.org/details/stripper_…
I just got a chance to watch it. I have to admit, of the eight dancers presented, I considered only two to be of the body-type which I would consider appealing at all, much less ideal for a stripper. I would (I suppose) be accepting of Rene (number four, with the cut-away longer dress) and Carmelita (with the fans) if they were to show up at my local club on stage. The others, I'd slink away to the bar and try to look the other way.
Hammy gammy flabby 1950s gals -- all meat and potatoes. I guess I can stand that look IF the tits match the ass; but what's happened here is that the ass and thighs are about 90% of the girl. Yick.
http://www.archive.org/details/stripper_…
is actually quite appealing to me, despite the fact that she evidently comes from the exact same era. Perhaps the proportionality between tops and bottoms is what appeals to me. Not sure -- Ms. Howard is certainly "hammy" like the others that I disliked. Am I correct in understanding that she's likely "all natural" since silicone implants were not yet invented when she was filmed?
http://www.somethingweird.com