I was wondering what were your guys interpretations of the three review P's now. Place, People, Price. The names have changed over the years so I'm wondering has your meaning and the way you grade changed as well? Here's mine.
Place-The actual physical building. A dive will get a lower score, a luxurious spot will get a higher score. Not necessarily though. If it's a place I'm comfortable in, it will get a higher score. It can be a nicer place but uncomfortable, I usually go middle with it. My one issue is if the club really restrictive with the rules, do I ding the place? Where it seems like it's just a physical judgment of everything. I have been in the past throwing the rules into this grade if they stand out as just particularly awful.
People- I just strictly use this to tell the audience how hot the dancer group was. That's it. The average of the group. If there are alot of hot girls thrown in with a lot of ugly girls. I'll look the other way on the not so hot girls, and still give it a great score.
Price-Used to be value. Is VIP affordable enough to be worth it. $40 dances? High cover? General affordability.
The tricky part for me is where to put in strictness/rules of the club? Where should be throwing that into? It seems like in reviews it's something that can affect all three scores. I remember one of the old categories was vampness. Maybe sort of like that. Extras sort of place could be closer to 10 and a Chicago strip club could be closer to 1. I'm a fan of the grades because I like to go to clubs with hotter women and if we aren't all on the same page, do I know what I'm really looking at? Are people dinging these grades because they aren't extras girls? That's sort of the point of this thread would we be better off with more categories to grade or less is more?
