Harvey Weinstein accuser: Mogul lacks male genitalia

I've got questions?

That seems like something that would be relatively easy to confirm one way or another.

No balls? Not an excuse to be an asshole. Or to skip wiping.

No. It's rape because he allegedly raped her.

Rape victims often testify regarding distinguishing marks or features that could only be visible during an assault.

What C.M.I. said. It can be considered evidence that the accuser actually saw the accused's genitals.