Fox steadfast on bias news reporting? Trump favoritism over the top?
Estafador
BIG APPLE
https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2020/01/24/polit…
"Asked to name media companies in which they have trust, 65% of Republicans named Fox News. One in 3 named ABC. And that's it. Not a single other news source was trusted by even 33% of self-identified Republicans in the Pew poll.
That's in stark contrast to both Democrats and the population at large. More than 1 in 3 Democrats named 13 media sources they trust. The general public named 8: ABC (48% trusted), CNN (47%), NBC (47%), CBS (45%), Fox News (43%), PBS (42%), BBC (35%), The New York Times (35%) and MSNBC (34%). (Note: The pollsters went through 30 media sources with the respondents.)"
The chart is in the link.
Got something to say?
Start your own discussion
25 comments
Latest
The reason that Republicans don't trust those other news sources is because they have proven, time and again, that they cannot be trusted to report a story straight. Every story is a spun editorial now. Some will now shamelessly publish outright speculation and uncorroborated accusations as if they are indisputable facts. Then of course there are the myriad of stories that they choose to ignore, most especially when it doesn't suit their political agendas.
There was a time when the news media was the 4th estate and I wish it still was. But nowadays they pander to specific groups who drive their viewership because they've found that those groups prefer biased reporting.
By the way, Pew was one of the same outfits that published polls showing that Clinton beating Trump by a wide margin. They are not particularly well known for polling integrity or accuracy.
About the only news source that I trust anymore is the Wall Street Journal, which has a broad readership of all political stripes. Also, the only polling source I trust anymore is Rassmussen, which was about the only polling source to get the Presidential election right.
When looking for news sources I look at the number of Pulitzer Prize winners and top goes to (in order) (1) NY times (2) WaPo(4) AP (5) LA Times (6) WSJ with NY Times having twice as many Pulizers as 2nd place WaPo. All of these do a decent job of separating news from editorial content. They all live and die by getting the facts straight.
I currently have paid subscriptions to NY Times, WaPo, and Economist. I grew up in metro LA and it would arrive in paper form every day while growing up. LA Times changed hands, but it used to be a terrific news source. I had paid subscription to WSJ for decades and it's a good source of news, especially foreign policy.
Authoritarian regimes either own the news or they have success manipulating the news. Trump is a master at manipulating the media and Fox has become the official mouthpiece for Trump propaganda. It's a real problem because Trump lies *constantly* and everything he says needs to be fact-checked. Agree completely with @Esta and it's a very big problem as the country slides into chaos.
Nate Silver at 538 has gained a lot of praise for his statistics-based reporting and data-science skills applied to polling. Rassmussen has was one of the worst records for right-wing bias and Silver adjusts the Rassmussen results based on their on their past predictive performance. Rassmussen gets a rating of C+ over on 538. Fox News polling actually isn't bad.
The title of the article was "This 1 chart explains how bad Fox News is for our politics"
The actual "chart" in the article was blurry, and I couldn't read the text. Yet somehow, CNN wants me to trust them? Also, if editors were still a thing, they'd have changed the digit "1" to the word "One" in the headline.
But you be you, CNN.
(FWIW, I don't watch FOXNEWS at all)
$500 says that does nothing to improve their tanking ratings.
If you want us to believe you, do a better job editing.
Am I the only one who finds that funny?
Cut through the political bullshit on most subjects you’ll find many actually agree on the issues, it’s the nuances that create all of the turmoil.
The issue appears to be that, when networks made the switch from one hour of news per day every evening, to 24-hour "news" all the time, the quality of that news dropped because editorial oversight went down, and the bar for what is considered newsworthy dropped to near National Enquirer levels.
I could go on, but I won't.
"The democrats are relying on facts, but the republicans are relying on Fox"
--Maureen Dowd
"The democrats are relying on facts, but the republicans are relying on Fox"
--Maureen Dowd
Random Member +10
Jeffrey Toobin on impeachment trial: Trump is winning here
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zqrL8JLE…
SJG
People get their news from multiple online sources, even from sites like this one. At least I do.
Fox has never been anything but a psychological attack and sanity and rationalism.
Roger Ailles had cut his teeth working for the Tobacco Industry, blocking the passage of CA's first attempts at indoor air protection about 1979.
He ran this campaign called "Californian's for Common Sense", using what are now called Thelma and Louise spots. This is how the Republican's do it. Today we know that these sorts of appeals target the Lizard Brain.
Its just the most bullshit that money can buy.
Fox is total nonsense.
But some people believe it.
If held up to the light of truth, the Fox version of affairs will never stand up.
SJG
Adam Schiff: No meaningful impeachment trial without John Bolton
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_PhXqYDb…
If Trump wanted to help his party he could just promise not to run in Nov, or he could just resign. This would give them a chance to come up with a reasonable candidate.
Humble Pie-30 Days In The Hole
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sdXjm8pZ…
Frampton, Do You Feel Like We Do
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U0wVJE3V…
SJG's Photo Album
https://tuscl.net/photos.php?member_id=4…