I didn't think it sounded like RL or any other lowlife that we typically place on the ignore list here. In fact, MY first impression was that the review was done tongue-in-cheek, and possibly by one of the more respected TUSCLers found on this discussion board.
My theory is that it was Shadowcat... you know... Shadowcat... Shadowcunt... awfully close together. Also, mention was made of daughter selling perfume... I know someone on the board hear gets perfume from their daughter and passes it out to dancers... was it Shadowcat? Bones? Fondl? Sorry, but I can't remember...
Also, the reviewer registered their screen name the same day that the review was posted...
arrgh... in prev post, "hear" = "here" ... I try not to make those types of typos, but I somehow let that one slip... My appologies to those that take notice of that sort of thing...
My guess is that it is Clifbar / davids / RL. Even with those characters (all the same psycho) on ignore he finds a way to leak through. I implore you Clifbar go back to sucking dick. It is what you do best!
Sorry DougS, It wasn't me. I can't even read the review. My account expired on 2/20. I wish I would have thought of that name when I had to get a replacement for shadowcat.
Hmmm...an interesting turn of events... I went back to re-read the infamous post, and to copy/paste it into an email for IGU. Well, guess what wasn't there any longer. Someone removed that review.
DougS, I do notice that sort of thing. Mot frequently when re-reading my own posts. I've always been both a poor typist and a poor proofreader. And not so hot at spelling either. And too lazy to spellcheck.
Comments
last commentI didn't think it sounded like RL or any other lowlife that we typically place on the ignore list here. In fact, MY first impression was that the review was done tongue-in-cheek, and possibly by one of the more respected TUSCLers found on this discussion board.
My theory is that it was Shadowcat... you know... Shadowcat... Shadowcunt... awfully close together. Also, mention was made of daughter selling perfume... I know someone on the board hear gets perfume from their daughter and passes it out to dancers... was it Shadowcat? Bones? Fondl? Sorry, but I can't remember...
Also, the reviewer registered their screen name the same day that the review was posted...
Log in to vote
arrgh... in prev post, "hear" = "here" ... I try not to make those types of typos, but I somehow let that one slip... My appologies to those that take notice of that sort of thing...
Log in to vote
My guess is that it is Clifbar / davids / RL. Even with those characters (all the same psycho) on ignore he finds a way to leak through. I implore you Clifbar go back to sucking dick. It is what you do best!
Log in to vote
Sorry DougS, It wasn't me. I can't even read the review. My account expired on 2/20. I wish I would have thought of that name when I had to get a replacement for shadowcat.
Could you email it to me. I am curious. Thanks...
Log in to vote
If that was meant to be tongue-in-cheek, he forgot to include humor. Probably some sad, long forgotten bore on my ignore list.
Log in to vote
The review seems like a "parody" of shadowcats reviews. I'll just chuckle once & move on.
Log in to vote
Sorry minnow but it was not me. Fuck You very much.
Log in to vote
Hmmm...an interesting turn of events... I went back to re-read the infamous post, and to copy/paste it into an email for IGU. Well, guess what wasn't there any longer. Someone removed that review.
It's gone (or I'm blind).
Log in to vote
Well, you know that I didn't get it removed. You know that I have no influence with founder/editors.
Log in to vote
DougS, I do notice that sort of thing. Mot frequently when re-reading my own posts. I've always been both a poor typist and a poor proofreader. And not so hot at spelling either. And too lazy to spellcheck.
Log in to vote