California Penal Code 653.23 PC
TrapBaby304
Trap Jumpin
Engages in prostitution or
Loiters for the purpose of engaging in prostitution.
Meaning, those of you answering question relating to prostitution, enabling prostitution, advising others on prostitution, can keep going right ahead. But keep in mind screen shots and website server evidence may be downloaded and given to the proper authorities. You're not actually as anonymous as you think.
Now you can get a slap on the wrist or 6 months in CA but the same charges will bring you 7 years in NV.
A smart trick would make it so they could argue having made a mistake of fact, but your egos are too big for that and frankly you're too stupid to get it.
Got something to say?
Start your own discussion
13 comments
Latest
If I take a prostitute home, am I committing an illegal act? What if I drop her off at a customer's house? Is he even a customer before she's paid? This is a very slippery slope; I'm sure TUSCL members can imagine very vague circumstances that are subject to interpretation, and the Constitution says laws must be clear.
It basically says that giving people advice about fucking hookers constitutes aiding prostitution.
Prostitution laws are not a slippery slope. They're not under the constitutional right to intimate conduct between consensual adults. They fall under illegal employment. ....which has no constitutional protections.
Everything posted on this site is fiction btw.
PC 647 is kind of a mash up. It makes it illegal to solicit prostitution, covers voyeurism and drugging/date rape. Basically things that can get a charge of gross and open lewdness.
I for one never talk to them in any manner which is anything other than entirely civilian.
Learned that in AMPs.
SJG
One good thing some cops do is identify hookers with HIV/AIDS or STDs to tricks when they know they lack enough evidence to press actual charges.
Talk about Trafficking is how LE and Moral Crusaders get people to think of Prostitution as something akin to Terrorism.
SJG