"Theft of services".
shadowcat
Atlanta suburb
This story is about the latter. Namely, that the customer is required to pay for services rendered when asked to do so. Often, this happens before said services are provided, but sometimes, the fiduciary exchange does not occur until afterwards.
Which brings us to Cheerleaders Gentleman’s Club in Gloucester City, Camden County. If this establishment (but not its location) rings a bell, it’s because its same-named sister club is located about five miles west across the Walt Whitman Bridge in South Philly.
It was still the first half of the Eagles/Saints game at 5:18 p.m. on November 18 when Gloucester City Patrolman Ben McKinney responded to the club for – per police reports provided online by his department – a “theft of services complaint.”
Turned out that a 45-year-old Clementon man found himself in the precarious position of facing a $150 bill for six lap dances without adequate funding to cover this bill.
“The male was found to have only $11.00 on his person,” read the report about this sordid mess. “The management of the club was informed of their options and no criminal charges have been filed. The male is no longer welcome at the club.”
The man's name was not released as he wasn't formally charged with any crime. We’re guessing he had no friends willing to kick in a few bucks, or an ATM card with access to an account with legal tender to hand to his lap-dance provider.
We’ll likely never know more details – songs playing during his lap dances, his demeanor, etc. – as officials at Cheerleaders didn’t respond to requests for comment. (Were you there? By all means, drop a line as we'd like to know more about it. Your anonymity will be protected.)
Lt. Stephen Burkhardt, spokesman for the Gloucester City Police Department, noted that calls like this are rare for the location.
"We actually field very few calls at this establishment in general, and I don’t recall ever having a theft of services complaint such as this one,” he said. “My impression is that a combination of intoxication and getting caught up in all the excitement, coupled with not being required to pay up front, led to his lapse in judgment.”
Burkhardt noted that there was a happy-ish ending to this tale, at least from a moral and/or make-good-on-obligations perspective.
“He did offer to return the following day to pay the bill," Burkhardt shared. "However, we haven’t heard if he did so.”
Got something to say?
Start your own discussion
16 comments
Latest
SJG
The Jeff Healey Band - Live In Belgium (Full Concert 1993)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s_ufNFTA…
TJ Street
https://farm8.static.flickr.com/7318/961…
https://farm8.staticflickr.com/7290/9620…
https://c2.staticflickr.com/6/5449/96322…
https://c1.staticflickr.com/3/2849/96290…
On the other hand, where the PL pays up front, the stripper can pocket his money and just...walk...away... and there's nothing that the PL can do about it. The stripper is an independent contractor and once the money is in her control, there's no way to get it back from her if she doesn't want to give it back. You can't force her to dance or get naked or even continue sitting with you. The money is gone and spent and if you want to get the stripper to do something, you have to offer her more, and pay her again after additional services are rendered. YOU SHOULD ASSUME THAT ANY MONEY YOU GIVE TO A STRIPPER WILL ONLY PAY FOR WHAT'S HAPPENED IN THE PAST. Most strippers are not like this and will conduct business in a way that's beneficial for both parties, but they do have the option to screw you over with very little consequence.
I understand the risk that paying at the end puts on a stripper, but I feel strippers should be the one to bear that risk. Both parties want the transaction to go well but the stripper has more to lose if it doesn't happen. If the PL doesn't get any dances then he gets blue balls, which can be uncomfortable but he'll eventually manage and get over the loss of the transaction. If the stripper can't sell any dances, maybe she struggles to pay her rent for that month or feed herself or her child. Because she has more to lose by not doing business with the PL, she therefore has more to gain when the transaction happens. Because she is getting more out of the arrangement han we are, I feel that she should be the one to bear the risk of a failed transaction.
$ per song.
or $ per 15 (or 30) minutes.
plus tip if necessary.