Has the rating algorithm changed ?

That makes sense as clubs and local Political environment changes. But hopefully this doesn't cause a lot of club ads.

This was a topic of conversation a while back and I think Founder went along with the consensus that newer reviews (year or less?) should have more weighing

@94

What makes you conclude that and what rating are you looking at (overall TUSCL rating)?

I’m basing it on the Phoenix clubs where the ratings now seem to accurately reflect the current state of things. Until recently, HL had a rating that was more reflective of its glory days.