A MARRIED couple who were desperate to conceive were found to have been having anal sex for four years.
The extraordinary blunder came to light after a 26-year-old man and his 24-year-old wife went to see an obstetrician about their lack of success.
Mystery… The woman could not understand why she had not become pregnant despite having loads of unprotected sex for four years When Dr Liu Hongmei investigated further she found out the woman had regular sex but that it was “unusually painful” every time.
At first Dr Lui thought her patient might be suffering some sort of disease or disorder.
But according to China’s Guiyang Evening Post, further examinations found the clueless couple from Bijie city in China’s south-western Guizhou province, had been having anal sex all along.
Further tests confirmed this and amazingly found the wife was virgin.


Replies (13)Latest
A lot of us probably wish we knew a woman like that, assuming she at least understood blow jobs too.
Homo
Is this why San Jose Guy was allegedly married but never had kids?
This is not April 1.
@shailynn: No, but that is how he was conceived, which explains a lot...... ;-)
sc,
Well they won't have offspring that could become "Darwined"!
Ha.
I was going to say I guess they were conservative backgrounds without sex ed and/or nervous. And i was also going to say they must not have add access to pornography in China (firewall) either. but given the prevalence of anal porn on the tube sites, maybe they did have access and that's the problem. Ha!
But was the couple originally from Flori-duh?
Hmmm. You'd think after pounding her ass for a few years he would have noticed the other hole nearby and given it a try.
They must have thought it was just for peeing or defective because it would bleed every 4 weeks. :D
That is quite embarrassing, but I don't think its as bad as the other Darwin award nominees...
Jackslash, I'm with you. This sounds like a bad April Fool's joke.
Here is my source for the story. Be sure to watch the video.
Join the conversation
Sign in to reply to this discussion.