My reply to daisy dukes post. Warning: must be a reasoned person to refute, as a

Characteristic**

“Wearing daisy shorts that allow one's ass to be visible doesn’t need to be justified to anyone for any reason.”

Fixed it for you. Other people doesn’t get to tell you what to wear. Full stop. The fact that the law and current mores disagree with that mean that the law and mores are wrong, not the Daisy Dukes.

Stop sexualizing women’s bodies. Your personal peccadilloes regarding clothing aren’t some kind of natural law. They don’t mean squat.

Oh, and fuck off with your moralizing.

Lol it's funny how the troll (Nicole1994) has gotten so sick of his/her poor grammar that even (s)he has at least upgraded it from entirely incoherent to simply ridiculous.

Such an obvious troll, that one.

There is no moral basis for this lmao- I have made an appeal to logos, not ethos, to substantiate my argument, as the premise of it is based on a definition as opposed to a.moral outcry.

You're a rock ho.

Nicole, does that mean you would be bothered by me wearing daisy dukes for you? Should I just forego it and only wear a body suit instead?

I don’t expect women’s bodies to stop being sexualized any time soon. But for a women to slut shame another woman for wearing something like that is fucked up.

Nichole... 120 years ago... to see a woman's ankles was considered salacious.

and still in some societies just to see more than the eyes is salishious.

Siri can't figure out how to spell siliceous (seri' spelling and certainly I don't know either.)

Im.not fucking slut shaming women. Im.stating that the obvious shouldnt be done. IdgAf how short a girl's shorts are etc..but you shouldn't show ur ass in public..lol the fuck?.

@spice bby this post clearly pertains to public spaces.if you are going to mock me, at least do so.in a way that acknowledges , rather than ignores, the obvious premise of my post, which is not that daisy dukes shouldnt be worn, but rather that they shouldn't be in an open pu luv space. So.u wearing that in a house or even strip club is different. U can.wear whatever u want and I will cuddle with u lolol

If a woman wishes to show a bit of her ass - by wearing daisy dukes - there’s nothing wrong with that. It’s a woman’s choice, and she can choose to cover her ass completely - or show it off.

Totally.bc the ass cheek is something that is not intimate(sarcasm), and hence should justifiably be compared to non intimate body parts which are acceptable to be shown. Totally, guys.

So Nicole1994, women at public beaches should all wear cover-ups and not show their bodies in bathing suits since the ass cheek is so "intimate"?

Dont think they should cover their.bodies for any reason let alone at the pool , but I've always questioned why a woman would need to show.her butt cheeks in public at the pool, as their are skirt swimsuits, etc and others which dont show ass cheek....

Then why have you posted naked pics of yourself if a swimsuit at a pool or beach is too much skin?

I have to admit, I've never understood why it's ok for women to wear a thong bikini at a public beach or a pool, and yet it's not ok for a woman to wear a bra and panties anywhere outside of a bedroom. We have strange standards. The bikini covers up exactly as much skin as the underwear does, if not less.

Oh, also, Nicole, you write quite poorly. Are you sure the law is really the ideal profession for you? Are you aware that you will have to write with precision and clarity, like, every single day of your life from law school to retirement? Maybe Nina is right and rock-ho would be a better career path.

Lol um.maybe because.dressing in daisy dukes and hence exposing more skin is ok to do in a strip club (i.think.it.was.this.thread i.stated that in) because the inherent function of such an establishment is purposely designed for a woman to dress that way based on the services rendered, whereas is not the case with the pool, since its inherent function(to allow ppl to swim in water) is not impeded based on whether or not ass cheeks in particular are exposed?

Lol..and this tUscl website for which I have posted raunchy pics undoubtedly falls under the former category(strip club rather than pool) for which I have demonstrated that dressing provocatively is allowed

@Dc:

In the original post, i said "daisy dukes that show.ass" as opposed 2 daisy dukes in general. Hence, this post is entirely and solely devoted to "daisy dukes/any other shorts that show ass" Ok thx.

Premise #1: No action requires justification unless there exists legislation that dictates judicial action as a consequence.

Premise # 2: No legislation exists that dictates a judicial action as a consequence of wearing daisy dukes short-shorts that bear some portion of the ass cheeks.

Conclusion: Wearing daisy dukes short-shorts that bear some portion of the ass cheeks does not require justification.

I’ll get back to one regarding the question of whether or not that action CAN be justified. In the mean time, this comment hereby serves as a logical way of saying:

FUCK OFF!

If Nicole will be wearing her Daisy Dukes for our Skype session tonight - I’ll request that she Skype on all fours with her ass facing the camera. She has a pretty face - but her booty is amazing!

^^ be sure to take some good screen shots if she does!

Definitely! I’ll make sure her hot booty gets excellent exposure.

I dont have daisy dukes although I wanna buy them but if i did um they would not show my ass ?

And we never scheduled a skype session stop lying plz thx

@cash do u really think I would be ok with skyping u on all fours.cmon that is such an unrealistic possibility that even a joke suggesting that i would cannot possibly be remotely funny ?

Nicole, based on your reply, it’s something you aren’t sure of yet. No worries.

When you start shopping for those daisy dukes - and you get a peek at how super cute your booty looks - when you show some cheek - we’ll have a great Skype session!

I’ll get a pair to wear too - so you don’t feel uncomfortable - lol!

Aww, Nicole, you have a quality problem there ;) Your booty is too phat to fit completely covered in them. I also have a friend with that problem in San Antonio. She works at a club that complies with the “no ass cheek exposed” rule. I believe she just gave up and wore flesh colored tights underneath.

And lol, I’m interested in this Skype call as well.

NiceSpice - i think Nicole would love to show some cheek in sexy daisy dukes! She’s trying to act demure, but I know she has a very intense desire to show me her sexy booty.

True, it's the repressed ones who can get the most freaky ;)

No I love showing my body lol and thay isnt something I hide bc i posted pics of it..it is a matter of what kind of dude I show it to lolol

Cashman is a nice older gentleman who works in the banking field, I believe he said.

Clearly not a filthy pervert at all. :)

Lol filthy pervert has nothing to do with a man's level of education or work..esp 4 a girl who has gotten into.ivy league school during what was its historicallymost competitive year and UT while also doing good here all by herself :))

^^.. Bc idk what a dudes work or level of education has anything to do with how i would be treated .im not saying cash is degrading to women, but how he would treat them is less correlated with his socioeconomic status than with his internal.characterisrics.

Moreover, it doesn't mattter either way bc even though he is cool we don't click.lol

That’s me - older, banker, pervert. Gentleman? Maybe?

Nicole is trying to play hard to get. I know she loves showing me her hot body. Her booty is incredible!

Dude naw...we don't click.

Idgaf if you're a banker.thats great...but someone who is going to kill it in the legal field does not need to be impressed by a dudes job..esp if I'm surrounded by kids @ my school.who will.have that same.job in the future ..lmao .k.im done

There’s children at UT?

Damn kids these days are really precocious.

Lol um ok @spice

I’m not trying to impress anyone by saying I’m a banker. I’m simply stating my job. There’s nothing impressive about being a banker!