So, no longer do I see San Francisco as being under attack by a large strip club operator. They are just business people trying to make money for their share holders. They know what they are doing, and actually they run some wild places. So we need them as there are good things they bring to the situation. And that 2008 financial melt down would have closed up strip clubs which would be hard to replace because of zoning.
The real issue is LE, otherwise here it would be just like it is in TJ. Our culture would be different if guys were accustomed to front room makeout sessions followed by TLNs.
So how do we open more clubs, and of what type?
To me, smaller opens easier and cheaper, and is more likely to be something which can be considered disposable.
So I notice that with AMPs, LE closes them and closes them, but then they reopen right away with different girls in charge.
LE has tried to get ordinances passed to stop the property from being used again for another AMP, once closed. But this is unconstitutional, violates the rights of the owner.
So as the unit is already renovated for an AMP, it just reopens with another girl running it.
So as I see it, want to look at the best aspects of an AMP and a Strip Club, and figure out how to combine them, get the essentials of both, for a better operation. AMPs have better back rooms and showers. Strip Clubs allow front room fraternizing, which opens the door to GFE auditions. And in Houston, on Old Telephone Road, there are Asian Hostess Bars which combine both of these features. Guys have talked about the Front Room GFE auditions in reviews.
As I see it, the membership club model is an outstanding one, much harder for LE to crack. And no alcohol is better, safer, less problems.
And of course you don't ever want to call any of it massage, as in CA that requires a special license.
SJG
^^^So why don't you put your money where your mouth is and show us how it can be done.