Dancer Lawsuits

12 comments

• jackslash

  •

  9 years ago

  The clubs keep losing these lawsuits. How stupid do you have to be to lose lawsuits to strippers?
  
• Papi_Chulo

  •

  9 years ago

  The strip club business is a shady business. Where else does one charge $8 for a bottle of water - WATER?
• crazyjoe

  •

  9 years ago

  Jack you are right.
• crazyjoe

  •

  9 years ago

  Jack you are right.
• crazyjoe

  •

  9 years ago

  Jack you are right.
• crazyjoe

  •

  9 years ago

  Jack you are right.
• sinclair

  •

  9 years ago

  It seems like these fair pay lawsuits are happening in alot of locales, and the dancers are more often than not winning, whether that be by winning the lawsuits or the club agreeing to a settlement. It seems to depend on the attitudes of the judges in the different areas. The way I see it, if you are an independent contractor, you are owed nothing. If you are not making enough money at a given club, go to another club. If you are not making enough money as a stripper, then go work a regular job like most Americans do.
  
  Lawyers and strip clubs are both shady. I wouldn't be surprised if this lawyer is pursuing cases involving strippers in the hopes that he can get some access to some South Florida pussy and cocaine.
• motorhead

  •

  9 years ago

  I looked at the FAQ section of the attorney's website. Interesting that he never mentioned what "his cut" of take would be.
  
  Jack in correct that the clubs are indeed mis-classifying dancers as independent contractors and the courts continue to rule as such. But I'm still not convinced that the vast majority of "working" dancers want the system changed.
• rob0411

  •

  9 years ago

  How will the system change? Easy solution for the law is to make dancers employees and put them on the old time piecework system. The dancers get minimum wage for the hours they are there, then a cut of the money they earn for dances. This would require a person to check them in and out of the dance room, keep track of their time, and collect the money (probably in advance) from the customer.
  
  From a customer standpoint, this would suck. It happens now in a number of clubs in NC and is the reason I don't go to them. No more casual conversation in the back. Everything becomes very mechanical because there is a charge for every song you're with her.
• shadowcat

  •

  9 years ago

  Typically the attorneys take 33%. I agree that most dancers do not want to change the system. All of these law suites are brought by former employees are now flippin burgers and see it as a n easy way to pick up some cash.
  
  If I was a club owner I would get together with an attorney and come up with a written agreement for all present and future dancers to sign agreeing to their status as independent contractors.
• deogol

  •

  9 years ago

  "If I was a club owner I would get together with an attorney and come up with a written agreement for all present and future dancers to sign agreeing to their status as independent contractors. "
  
  Can't enforce an illegal agreement.
• motorhead

  •

  9 years ago

  There seems to be some debate of who started the independent contractor model. In his book "The Topless Prophet", Alan Markovitz (Flight Club, PHC Detroit) claims he did. Other sources cite MBOT in San Francisco.
  
  Read Markovitz's account. When he first made the change the dancers got mad and quit but a week latet they were back and making more money than ever.
  
  Like I keep saying. It's win-win for both even if it is illegal.