Biggest threat to strip clubs ever?
Look for a lot of strip clubs to close soon, even if they aren't doing anything illegal. Local governmetns now have a new weapon at their disposal. I'm not a lawyer (thank God) but it seems to me that yesterday's Supreme Court ruling, which removed local government restrictions on their use of eminent domain, means that any local government can now seize any private property if they don't like the use to which the property is being put. Five liberal judges voted for reducing rights of private property owners, four conservative judges voted against. I don't know about you but I for one am really tired of activist liberal judges rewriting our laws and taking away our freedoms. Little wonder that conservatives keep gaining strength.
Got something to say?
Start your own discussion
20 comments
Neither party represents people like us who think a large central government is the wrong way to go. Sometimes I wonder why I bother to vote. I think the problem is that people who don't believe in an activist government don't run for office, and that everyone who gets elected sooner or later comes to believe that big government is the answer to every problem. I think that's the basic flaw in democracy and will eventually lead to our downfall. But probably not anytime soon. I'm glad I won't be here to see it.
A state constitution can give more freedoms than the federal constitution, and in that respect will be upheld. Example: The U.S. Constitution has been interpreted as permitting capital punishment. However, about twelve states abolish capital punishment in their own Constitutions. Therefore, prosecutors in those states cannot obtain the death penalty, although the federal constitution is OK with it.
A state constitution can grant more freedoms to the people than the federal constitution (such as the right to be free from certain takings of private property), but cannot take away freedoms that are provided for in the U.S. Constitution.
If the direction of liberties went the other way...for example, if the Supreme Court had interpreted the 14th Amendment to forbid the taking of private property for mixed public/private purposes, then the States could not have violated that.
To me, as a traditional "small government" Republican, this ruling is absolutely chilling. I don't understand the advantage, in terms of personal liberties, of having a majority Republican court, if this is the result. I thought that Republicanism/conservatism stood for suspicion of the exercise of government power, and restrictions on same for the benefit of personal liberties.
By the way, this ruling got a whole lot of coverage in my local area because there has been an ongoing fight locally between a farmer who is trying to keep his farm vs. a local town that wanted to take it to build a golf course as part of a proposed recreational center. The farmer recently won the dispute when the leading proponent of the plan moved to another town.
BTW, Chitown, my slur about the legal profession, as you call it, is actually quite factual in my case. I almost went to law school at one point in my life but instead choose graduate school in another field. And I'm really glad I did, I would have hated being a lawyer. The paperwork would have driven me nuts. Much too detail-oriented for me. So when I say thank God I'm not a lawyer I'm being quite accurate, not slurring the profession.
It seems like strip clubs may be of some public benefit as well so I wonder if anyone has considered that strip clubs may be generating significant tax revenue and churches don't. I doubt this would happen but couldn't a large privately owned adult entertainment complex be located where a church was at and the privately owned church would have to sell at fair market value? Again I doubt this would happen but it seems possible now. It all depends on who is on the city council or your state politicians.
Do you know of a link or list of those states? I was thinking of writing senators and congressmen to get new laws passed to protect private property but didn't want to if we already have some laws. Is South Carolina and North Carolina on the list?
I do not believe it's fair to compensate someone at fair market value for their property they do not wish to sell. Perhaps twice market value would be fair. The increase would help pay for moving expenses and moving to a less desirable area and possibly much less desirable commutes, traffic, and all other kinds of hassles. I really do not like the thought that now people who run big business can decide oh, let's build a mall here, a strip outlet here, and a hotel here, and just forget about all the neighborhoods and long time citizens living in an area. I understand the community can decide a new highway or public buildings may be necessary at times, however I strongly disagree with this Supreme court decision. I think we need some new laws to protect private property. I don't think it's fair to pay someone existing fair market value for their property and kick them out for a privately owned development.
As a writer above said, the opinion held that local governments can take ("condemn") private property for mixed private-public uses, like increasing the tax base through a shopping center development. Before this case, there was a respectable argument that private land could only be taken for solely public uses, like road expansion.
In a marginal way, this might make some strip clubs vulnerable to condemnation, if they are located in run-down, arguably "blighted" areas, and the local government can get a developer to agree to take the parcel of property that a club is on, and develop it for ostensibly more "public-oriented" usages.
By the way, this won't have any effect in states that have their own constitutional prohibition against the State taking any property for private use. I know of several in this category.
That's enough law for a Friday afternoon.
This is exactly why I fear separating church from government, because religious organizations tend to care more about ordinary people than do governments. When you remove religion from politics, the only god left is money. We've already got too much of that in my opinion. Separation of church and state will make it worse.