As a fan of cool science fiction I'm going to point my pervo brothers to photos of the hot Rachel Nichols (different from the ESPN Rachel Nichols)
Blonde in these, which is unfortunate since she I hotter as a redhead (only thing worth watching in the first GI Joe movie) or brunette. But still -- WEEE-YAWWW!!!


Replies (8)Latest
And then there is:
Don't know if it is actually Rachel. Does look like her and she was blonde on Criminal Minds (so if the shoot is from that time the hair color is plausible).
But who the fuck cares. The pics are HAWT. FAP FAP FAP FAP!!!
Yeooowww!
Not only is Rachel frickin' HAWT, but the show Continuum is some coo-el science fiction. Can't believe more folks ain't addin' a WEEE-YAWWW!!!
playboy.com Continuum, Star Trek & Alias star Rachel Nichols
WEEE-YAWWW!!! I'd dig seeing her in a club. Fuck yeah!!!
I like Rachel Nichols from espn a whole lot more than the sci-fi one. any pics of her instead?
meh
C'mon ratdog dude...do some searches! Has your fav Rachel Nichols ever flashed tit-tayz? Did she suck Brett Farve's lil' Farve during the sexting scandal? As the catchphrase in the ads say, enquiring minds want to know!
And ilbbaicnl my brother...meh? To each his own i suppose. But we need some of your creative perspective on things. Which nekkid sci-fi babe old you dig.
I have to admit, Alice Eve's rockin' TIT-tayz were the best part of Star Trek: Into Darkness. The first JJ Trek was OK if you just considered it an action movie and not a Star Trek movie. And it had -- wait for it -- Rachel Nichols as an Orion slave chick (but at Starfleet academy, so presumably not a slave).
In contrast, JJ Trek: Into Darkness didn't even succeed at that level. Did have Alice Eve in a bra though. Need her all nekkid and shit. And less crappy Star Trek...
I gots to agree with rattdog.
I was so disappointed it wasn't the real Rachel Nichols from ESPN. She did nothing for me when I first noticed her several years ago but now I totally am into her. A flirtatious little hottie.
Join the conversation
Sign in to reply to this discussion.