Check on the 14 reviews for Edens and tell me what the heck you think is going on. The member rating is states as 9.67/10, with a positive trend of 3.08. I copied down the 14 posted reviews and the arithmetic average (mean) is 6.14 - much more realistic when you read the actual reviews.
What kind of an algorithm could generate a 9.67 "member rating" ??
Like most of you I am not overly enamored with the "member rating" anyway, but this seems crazy. If Founder reads this post, maybe he can explain.


That is rather odd...but I believe founder does not count the older reviews and reviews by new memebers into the ratings. For example, look at the most recent reviewers of the club. Jphive has been a member since august 2009. Mandalore84 has been a member since July 2009. These reviewers probably do not add much weight to the final rating, and for good reason. The most weight probably goes to the 9.67 given by paco1 because he has seniority and his review is recent. The club has so little reviews (if you add the club to your hotlist you will see it listed as 12 reviews instead of 14) so it does not appear on the top 100 even though it probably has the highest rating.