review comment
5 years ago
Here's an idea. (I know it sounds insane, but hear me out.) Ask each dancer her name when you first meet. If you can understand it because of the aural assault of the PA system, have the dancer repeat it right into your ear. And if she says "Jersey," then you know that's Jersey. I promise, I've tried this before and it actually works.
review comment
5 years ago
Using their stage names doesn't protect them from getting fired or busted by LE. Unless I am very much mistaken, Follies has a history of getting raided whenever local LE gets an inkling to do it. (Hell, I've been in the parking lot across the street when, suddenly, Follies' lot was full of squad cars with their blue lights flashing.)
Long-standing convention on this site is to use stage names OR discuss services/extras received but NOT BOTH. This review is too explicit and should have been rejected on that basis.
review comment
5 years ago
How does using only the stage name protect her?? Does she change it every week?
Permission or not, long-standing convention on this site is to provide (presumably stage) names of entertainers OR explicitly list extra services offered/rendered but NOT BOTH. Doing so can tip off management and/or LE. It's the very reason "Too explicit" is an option for rejecting a review, as this one should have been.
review comment
5 years ago
TY, @minnow. And, yes. As stated, this place is difficult to miss, even if the nav fails on the final details.
review comment
5 years ago
Clubber,
First, "two," not "to."
Second, you are incorrect in saying that my entire point is moot in that you haven't even addressed it and seem to have stopped reading my comment before you even reached it.
Please check the link you're pasting in your inane and tiresome "x+ lines is not a review" comment. I don't think it leads where you think it does.
And, my apologies. I hadn't realized Founder and the other members had appointed you the Minister of Review Measurement. As they seemingly have, perhaps word count is a better measurement than line count, as the latter is affected by screen dimensions and text size while the former is not. Just sayin'.
review comment
5 years ago
When Clubber copies/pastes his less-than-accurate length assessments of these reviews that don't satisfy his personal preferences, is he also pasting a wildly inappropriate link given what he wants the reviewer to read?
Or am I the only person who, after clicking the link, gets the page where one can submit a club review for E11even in Miami, FL?
review comment
5 years ago
You know what they say: never meet your whore-oes.
(Sorry; couldn't resist.)
review comment
5 years ago
Well, that's the problem with this site's limited 3-factor rating system, isn't it? For example, some might assign a value for "Club" based strictly on the aesthetics and upkeep of the facility itself while others might include what is/isn't available in terms of food, alcohol, and entertainment. And, JFC, the audacity of the some to use a subjective standard at all when rating a club instead of using the clear, absolutely objective standard of 7.6 equating to full-contact lappers with GFE.
I've had it! I call for a vote of "No Confidence" in the current management of TUSCL unless and until we are all given voice and allowed to freely review the clubs we visit, thus enabling other mongers to see past the meaningless ratings and delve fully into the minutiae of each published review!
Wait … what?
Oh, never mind.
review comment
5 years ago
Thanks. Good to know b/c I was starting to get the mistaken impression it had something to do with the granting of titles of nobility, which I'm sure you're aware, is strictly forbidden by Article I of the US Constitution. And, considering Philly is where the Constitution was written, … well, let's just say it woulda been a damn shame.
review comment
5 years ago
That's ridiculous. What about their taking down vital info from your ID demonstrates that they are carding everyone anyway?
Surely in this day and age, they have a security camera on the entrance. All that they really need to do is keep an archive of all activity viewable by that camera to demonstrate that no one enters without being carded.
JFC, my travels don't take me to AZ very often. But this club can be damn sure that I will not darken its door now.
review comment
5 years ago
No, techi1, not correct. Dancers come and go, literally and figuratively. Historically, this site has been about CLUB reviews, not dancer reviews. In fact, historically, a review listing a specific dancer performing specific acts in VIP have, generally, been considered too explicit.
If you want to know who gave Thedean16 the LD described above, do the polite and civil thing by asking in PM.
review comment
5 years ago
WTF is a "court" in this context?
review comment
5 years ago
This kind of BS is why I now always insist that a dancer wait for the start of a new song and "remind" me each time a new song starts. If a dancer fails to do it, I do it. "This is the second song, right?"
I can only remember one time that, when I did this, a dancer's count disagreed with mine. And that was resolved quickly by my asking , "Oh, when the the second song start?" She knew she was busted and immediately responded that she was mistaken.