2Old4This

Here's an idea. (I know it sounds insane, but hear me out.) Ask each dancer her name when you first meet. If you can understand it because of the aural assault of the PA system, have the dancer repeat it right into your ear. And if she says "Jersey," then you know that's Jersey. I promise, I've tried this before and it actually works.

Using their stage names doesn't protect them from getting fired or busted by LE. Unless I am very much mistaken, Follies has a history of getting raided whenever local LE gets an inkling to do it. (Hell, I've been in the parking lot across the street when, suddenly, Follies' lot was full of squad cars with their blue lights flashing.) Long-standing convention on this site is to use stage names OR discuss services/extras received but NOT BOTH. This review is too explicit and should have been rejected on that basis.

How does using only the stage name protect her?? Does she change it every week? Permission or not, long-standing convention on this site is to provide (presumably stage) names of entertainers OR explicitly list extra services offered/rendered but NOT BOTH. Doing so can tip off management and/or LE. It's the very reason "Too explicit" is an option for rejecting a review, as this one should have been.

TY, @minnow. And, yes. As stated, this place is difficult to miss, even if the nav fails on the final details.

Clubber, First, "two," not "to." Second, you are incorrect in saying that my entire point is moot in that you haven't even addressed it and seem to have stopped reading my comment before you even reached it. Please check the link you're pasting in your inane and tiresome "x+ lines is not a review" comment. I don't think it leads where you think it does. And, my apologies. I hadn't realized Founder and the other members had appointed you the Minister of Review Measurement. As they seemingly have, perhaps word count is a better measurement than line count, as the latter is affected by screen dimensions and text size while the former is not. Just sayin'.