avatar for Roosterboy
Roosterboy

Comments by Roosterboy

review comment
4 years ago
avatar for Roosterboy
Roosterboy
First time there - definitely different from the other clubs in Jax, and I'll surely head back again soon
Of course I tipped her! And my review was written in good English so it's obviously not a club ad. First time there, and I enjoyed it - at least when it picked up.
discussion comment
5 years ago
avatar for nickifree
nickifree
Texas
Only 3% of Black Male Homicides are Death by Police.
I know I'm a few days late on this thread, but it's interesting that almost every single person is backing themselves up with nothing but anecdotes, even while claiming to have sources on the subject. Since I haven't seen too many sources, I'll leave a few below. It's gonna be a long comment, but at the end I'll draw up some quick conclusions of my own for anyone interested. First a few sources on whether or not officers are targeting racial minority suspects: Do White Law Enforcement Officers Target Minority Suspects? https://sci-hub.tw/10.1111/puar.12956 Results from experimental trials testing participant responses to White, Hispanic and Black suspects in high-fidelity deadly force judgment and decision-making simulations https://sci-hub.tw/10.1007/s11292-012-9163-y Toward a Comprehensive Understanding of Officers’ Shooting Decisions: No Simple Answers to This Complex Problem https://sci-hub.tw/10.1080/01973533.2014.923312 Next, some sources on lending and economic status (relates to claims of modern redlining, racial discrimination in hiring, etc.): Mortgage Lending in Boston: Interpreting HMDA Data https://www.bostonfed.org/publications/research-department-working-paper/1992/mortgage-lending-in-boston-interpreting-hmda-data.aspx Race and Economic Opportunity in the United States http://www.equality-of-opportunity.org/assets/documents/race_summary.pdf Hiring bias study: Resumes with black, white, Hispanic names treated the same https://www.chicagotribune.com/business/ct-bias-hiring-0504-biz-20160503-story.html A New Study On Name Discrimination Suggests Names Signaling Race Are Also Linked To Social Status https://www.bustle.com/p/a-new-study-on-name-discrimination-suggests-names-signaling-race-are-also-linked-to-social-status-2348497 African-Americans over-represented among low-paying college majors https://www.pbs.org/newshour/education/african-americans-over-represented-among-low-paying-college-majors Here are some statistics on homicides by race and ethnicity, as well as people killed by cops (all from 2018 for consistency but I can give you data from other years as well): 2018 Crime in the United States: Homicides by Race and Ethnicity https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2018/crime-in-the-u.s.-2018/tables/expanded-homicide-data-table-6.xls People killed by police officers in 2018 (can sort by race, gender, weapon, fleeing from a crime, etc.) https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/2018/national/police-shootings-2018/ Fatal Encounters (another resource recording fatal encounters with police officers by race, gender, year, etc): https://fatalencounters.org/our-visualizations/ From all of the above, I'm torn between all the various sentiments in this thread. On the one hand I know that black people are not experiencing the same outcomes as white people at this point in time: higher rates of poverty, lower rates of education, lower paying jobs, higher rates of single-parent households, etc. I also feel for the people hearing about recent tragedies, having America's unfortunate past in their memories, and lashing out because they feel they're just seeing more of the same. If I was hanging out with a black person that felt that way, I'd buy them a drink and help them feel better. On the other hand, if I wanted to acknowledge the above inequities we see, and REALLY get to the root of the problem so I could start making some sense of it and ultimately some real progress, I'd take a clear look at the research and push sentimentality and anecdotes out of my mind. That doesn't mean I don't feel for my black brother above; it means I care so much about his plight, I'm going to push my own feelings out of the way and see what's really at the root of it so we can start to rectify the problem. So what does the data say? Many people are out there in the streets, claiming that black people have to live in constant fear that they'll be shot by a police officer for no reason. That is absolutely not true. Doesn't mean that we shouldn't work to reduce excessive force by law enforcement anyway, and that's something everyone can always agree on. But on the list of top threats to the lives of innocent black people, death by police is nowhere near the top. If we put the same amount of effort that's going to protest against the police instead towards lowering black-on-black crime, vastly more lives would be saved. Others rightly pointed out that it's not a "either-or" but a "both-and" - and that may be true, but still, the current response is completely unbalanced in the wrong direction. If we did instead take a clear look at real problems and work to solve them, the same amount of energy could save far more lives, and would bring with it less destruction of property, less injured/killed protesters and police officers, and less cultural and racial division. It's also helpful to keep in mind the ways different narratives are politically expedient to different groups of people. The worst thing that could happen for Democrats would be conditions getting better for black people, more broadly. If the broader narrative was that conditions have gotten VASTLY better for blacks by many metrics in recent decades (which they have), then the Democrats wouldn't be able to claim that "if you don't vote for me, you ain't black" (as Biden said). Blacks are a significant component of the Democratic voting base, and they will only be locked in as long as they can be convinced that everyone is against them EXCEPT the Democrats. I don't want to totally take Republicans off the hook either, though - Trump did say at some point something like "you guys are all poor, your schools are crumbling, and you're living in crime - why not vote for me, it can't get any worse". Also keep in mind that right on BLM's website, they make it clear that they're not just focused on racial equality, but also the whole gambit of far-left views: dismantle the patriarchy, dismantle the nuclear family (which ironically has already happened in black families and is probably largely to blame for high rates of crime and poverty), promote trans ideologies, etc. I don't care what your own particular views on any of those subjects are, but it's important to know that supporting BLM doesn't just mean you support black lives in general; it means you're getting behind an organization with very specific ideological leanings that extend far beyond the scope of racial inequity. Source for the above is their own website: https://blacklivesmatter.com/what-we-believe/ The real answer is to stop playing identity politics and start using politics to figure out what is best for the American people more broadly - not only what's best for this party or that. There's no such thing as "racial justice" and there's no such thing as "social justice". Justice is justice for individuals, and we're only innocent or guilty as individuals. As long as we teach people to see everything exclusively through the lens of skin color, we'll be doing exactly what the worst parts of our history did. MLK is so famous for a reason: because he saw right through this, and sought to take skin color out of the equation, not to continue focusing on it as America's racists had always done in the past. I'll end with a quote by Booker T. Washington, once a slave and later a free man: "There is another class of colored people who make a business of keeping the troubles, the wrongs, and the hardships of the Negro race before the public... Some of these people do not want the Negro to lose his grievances, because they do not want to lose their jobs... There is a certain class of race-problem solvers who don't want the patient to get well."
review comment
5 years ago
avatar for Roosterboy
Roosterboy
Went because I was curious, but... curiosity killed the cat. Never again.
Sorry I didn't have a post-covid review for you all, but apparently today's the day they start opening up again in Jax, so I'll do my best to collect some more intel! (on other places... not this one...) Buuuut yeah Papi, this wouldn't be the time to be there. (looting is great for free stuff, but you can't loot free dances, can you?) Absolutely snowtime, best thing is to keep on driving. Thanks though, Sins was actually the first place I visited in Jax but it was forever ago and I barely remember it so I'll have to get back there.
review comment
5 years ago
avatar for Roosterboy
Roosterboy
Chill atmosphere, pretty girls, and plan to return
Naw desertscrub, I wish I worked for the club but I don't. It's just a combination of my personality probably being less critical overall, and my experiences being limited since I didn't get any private dances or get to know any particular girl on a deeper level. I'm sure when I manage to go deeper on my next visit, I'll be able to clean more useful information.
review comment
5 years ago
avatar for Roosterboy
Roosterboy
Robotic girls, mediocre dance, unfortunately
I'll be in Tampa in a couple weeks, so I'm looking forward to finally checking some of them out too. Just gotta decide which ones to go to.
review comment
5 years ago
avatar for Roosterboy
Roosterboy
Robotic girls, mediocre dance, unfortunately
@codemonkey that's good to know, thank you. The girl I talked to only mentioned a regular dance and like a dance package that I think included 3 dances for the price of 2.5. My mistake though, so at least there is a more full-contact option. I still think I'll stick to the Jax clubs though, where most booths have no cameras and I know the girls that regularly provide extras.
discussion comment
5 years ago
avatar for rhiannon529
rhiannon529
Stage Names
I'm pretty new to the strip club scene to be honest, but so far I've liked when girls had more normal names. The traditional stripper names just seem so over-the-top, whereas I like sitting and having a chat with a girl who has a normal name. Makes it feel more like it's a normal girl at the bar I've been chatting with that get to see naked, rather than explicitly a stripper, who is just there to make money and is only artificially cordial to me. I know all strippers are there to work, but normal names make them seem less artificial than that (and many of the ones I've met that had more normal names were nice and chill and normal themselves!)
review comment
5 years ago
avatar for Roosterboy
Roosterboy
One of two full-nude clubs in Jax, pretty chill
Thanks for the advice! It was my first review on here too and I didn't have VIP, so I didn't know how detailed other reviews usually were. I can't find a way to edit my review, but if I manage to get back there again soon, I'll keep my eyes open and do a better job of laying out the entire experience in as much detail as possible.