The plethora of AI reviews are starting to get annoying. I know Founder is anti-mod, and frankly you have to be a special kind of retard to want to moderate a strip club forum, but this is starting to get out of hand. For god sake you retarded adjudicators, just because a review has lots of words doesn't make it real. If they are using flowery wording and being vague with details about specific wording, reject that shit.
Maybe we make it so that even if a review is approved, 4 anonymous AI reports post-approval get it removed. These AI assholes don't deserve 4 free weeks of VIP.
Replies (5)
I agree. Where it really gets bad are these YT videos that are obviously AI, though CG voices have been getting better. My thought on those are that those assholes don't deserve my time nor ad revenue.
Agreed
The choice to only require 4 adjudicator approvals was a terrible one.
The bar is so low now that we can't even get proper paragraph spacing on the majority of reviews, much less informative content. Not to mention any decent review for a popular club immediately gets buried by low effort crap.
It is easy enough to check for AI text. Just copy the review, go to an online AI detector such as originality.ai , paste the text and hit scan. I don’t do this for revie2, but for the ones that seem AI, I do.
Agreed. I would favor a system where you need 6 votes out of 7 to be positive to be admitted. 2 no's should be a no
All imho of course
Join the conversation
Sign in to reply to this discussion.