The plethora of AI reviews are starting to get annoying. I know Founder is anti-mod, and frankly you have to be a special kind of retard to want to moderate a strip club forum, but this is starting to get out of hand. For god sake you retarded adjudicators, just because a review has lots of words doesn't make it real. If they are using flowery wording and being vague with details about specific wording, reject that shit.
Maybe we make it so that even if a review is approved, 4 anonymous AI reports post-approval get it removed. These AI assholes don't deserve 4 free weeks of VIP.
Replies (7)Latest
I agree. Where it really gets bad are these YT videos that are obviously AI, though CG voices have been getting better. My thought on those are that those assholes don't deserve my time nor ad revenue.
Agreed
The choice to only require 4 adjudicator approvals was a terrible one.
The bar is so low now that we can't even get proper paragraph spacing on the majority of reviews, much less informative content. Not to mention any decent review for a popular club immediately gets buried by low effort crap.
@PAWG_Patrol. and minnow Everybody has a writing style, and not everybody knows how to write.
Some additional observations
AI learned from good writers.
We come here for intel not to read a properly formatted book on the NYT best seller list.
If you bust peoples balls for crappy writing and horrible formatting, dont be surprised when they turn to AI get their review published
If I can write, and maybe I can, since I have been paid for it for years, then consider that making a review fun and interesting just may not be AI or a discussion because I know how to draw you In to my experience. Isn't that what we are looking for is a memorable experience?
Like so much in life we reject what we don't recognize or we would do ourselves. Founder in his wisdom knows that content is King and the very survival of his site depends on it.
I can tell alot about an Individual by their rejection of others and their attempt to control others. They are sad pathetic losers in real life. You can verify that when their history shows rejections clocking in at 2/3 or so. If Founder let them have their way he would have some competition when a high drive doer created some competition.with another site that was as welcoming as this one is now to every style of writing and reporting.
Finally I am planning a trip to the mecca and have been gathering intel about surrounding clubs and let me tell you some of the best intel has been from the crappiest writers...but in the multitude of missives I have been able to derive a pretty accurate synopsis of what to expect that I couldnt from Eccie and others.
Conclusion. You dont have to like it to love what it does for us
It is easy enough to check for AI text. Just copy the review, go to an online AI detector such as originality.ai , paste the text and hit scan. I don’t do this for revie2, but for the ones that seem AI, I do.
Agreed. I would favor a system where you need 6 votes out of 7 to be positive to be admitted. 2 no's should be a no
All imho of course
@sfrsox. Until it hits you ..when AI claims your writing was fake then you will be screaming
Join the conversation
Sign in to reply to this discussion.