We have had a few ridiculous articles form new posters. the two latest are the only posts from the users. Should we ask founder to limit articles to people that have contributed some minimum number of reviews or discussion
i don't know if that is possible but i would welcome it.
Suppose newbie posts a ridiculous thread? Would that make you happy? The problem is lax adjudicators who approve such garbage articles.
That almost makes sense. AI has made it too easy for any fool to write a reasonably written article. The adjudication process is supposed to weed out such garbage, but we have some real idiots with no lives who just sit there and approve anything all day long. You should prove your bona fides as a strip club fan and patron before initiating discussions and writing articles.
It wouldn't stop it but it would cut down on the crap .
It looks like there are about 19 articles for 2026. That does not seem excessive. I may only look at a third of articles or discussions and I always figured the majority of members are not interested in my discussions also. I do not travel so I usually skip over anything involving strip clubs in other cities. If you see me commenting on a discussion or article it is because I thought it was a good topic to bring up.
People still approve them. No process is fool proof.
there are only a few ways to get out of newbie quarantine, and submitting an article is one of them. If you guys think an article is AI, then reject it.
Nah. Rely on adjudication and the ability to scroll past garbage. Feel free to name and shame the adjudicators who approve garbage.
I suggest that everyone who adjudicates an article copy and paste it into an AI generated text detector. I use originality.ai . it is free with some limititations. There other options. I suppose this could be done automatically when an article is submitted, but that probably puts too much of a burden on Founder. If it seems like AI, check it before you approve it.
I think we have to be tougher graders across the board. I would like to see maybe an indicator go up when judging a review that this is this persons FIRST contribution. I think it would help at least knowing that. Look at the reviews for Rick's NYC; All club ads. New accounts first review.
It shouldn’t be Founder’s job to weed out the bad posts. The TUSCL community has demonstrated that it’s fully capable of doing this. Despite this, some crap still gets through. So when it does, feel free to call it out.
I don’t think the system is full proof, but it seems to be working pretty well.
FOOL proof. Dang seri/alexa spell check.
Seems fair to me