Several AI written reviews have made it through and the fake bullshit pisses me off.
If adjudicators don't know the club, a vague AI review sometimes slips through.
These fake club reviewers need to be banned.
Several AI written reviews have made it through and the fake bullshit pisses me off.
If adjudicators don't know the club, a vague AI review sometimes slips through.
These fake club reviewers need to be banned.
Comments
last commentIf plagiarism results in a ban, so should submitting an AI review.
Log in to vote
You could DM founder, that's the only recourse if it's through adjudication.
One thing I think we need to distinguish is the difference between a review that was AI polished and one that is a full on AI invention.
The later type of review will contain no new useful information on the PEOPLE, PLACE, or PRICES. The former type of review can actually be quite useful, better even than an incoherent review.
The best thing adjudicators can do is just be really strict on reviews meeting the criteria spelled out in the review guidelines.
Log in to vote
AI polish is acceptable (though I think it's kind of lame).
The full on AI-invented review should be a perma-ban.
There were ones for Treasures Greensboro and Mirage recently that were complete fabrications, without a single correct detail.
Log in to vote
IMO, it would help if people who didn't know clubs didn't adjudicate them. There's been a number of fake reviews for clubs around here, not necessarily AI written but anyone whose been to the club knows the reviewer clearly hasn't been. When 75% of the details in the review are objectively wrong, and 75% of the subjective comments are out of character, you know it's fake. AI or not.
Log in to vote
I’ve said that before and it’s probably not feasible for all reviewers to be able to be familiar with the club, but it might help if there was at least one reviewer familiar with the club which might be difficult for some of the rarely reviewed clubs, but here is a suggestion that might work, what if founder were to have members who could be trusted members get some sort of mention and when they approve a review, it would make the review an approved review by virtue of their upvote.
Log in to vote
I don't think we need any extra approver power. It's not like there are quality reviews getting rejected, we saw the evidence of that when the site was showing rejected reviews.
I'd be for a "report" button on published reviews. But honestly I still like the thumbs up/thumbs down for reviews, combined with an easy way to filter out reviews that get a number or percentage of thumbs down.
Log in to vote
Call ‘em out in the comments to the review, and, for repeat offenders, call ‘em out in a discussion post. It also affords to poster a chance to defend themselves
Log in to vote
Shit. if I were to approve or disapprove based on my own experience at that club I would be hardly be a participating member. due to my crazy spending I did when I first started going to strip clubs in Las Vegas I don't have much now to freely spend going here and there and everywhere muddy style. When I approve or disapprove a review I am looking at useful information in that submitted review. And yeah... some of it can be BS but if it seems real I'll approve it.
Log in to vote
Part of this is why I don’t publish reviews for clubs outside my area. I don’t know enough to say Yes or No.
Those reviews that are less than the Twitte… I mean X character count get rejected instantly.
Log in to vote
@Dolfan I was not suggesting anyone get extra review power, just a symbol that this review was approved by a trusted member in addition to the number of upvotes, just that because it was reviewed by a trusted member that might give the review a bit more credibility, say than one that got upvoted by for example icee and three of his sock puppets
Log in to vote
The OP of the reviews being anonymous, until the review has actually been approved and posted, is ideal. Otherwise people will basically always upvote their friends reviews. Or always downvote someone they have a personal issue with. So it would be weaponized by trolls or people who have personal issues with other users and want to get back at them.
There are certain things that AI just cant know about a club. For instance if the club doesnt post their lineup on the internet… and you have to go there in person or call them. Then AI wont be able to get you that info.
I think what they could do is only allow you to adjudicate a review if youve already reviewed the same club before. This sort of feature wouldnt have been feasible back when the site started… but now with so many reviews already posted.. it could be implemented to cut down on future spam
Log in to vote
other strip club websites are overrun with fake reviews, reviews that mislead the customer and yet people on this site (that have power to approve or deny) the reviews that show up on this site...... seems like a rich person problem to me - when you approve a review DO YOUR BEST to APPROVE OR DENY - if you dont want to put in the effort. JUST DONT CLICK ANYTHING.
Log in to vote
I won’t adjudicate any reviews for clubs that I’ve never been to, unless it’s something really poorly written or completely incomplete. In which case I might reject.
Log in to vote
I agree with @iknowbetter and @The Mighty Quinn. I won't approve a review unless I know the club and the details to be accurate. I think everyone should do the same.
I will definitely reject a shitty review for a club I don't know though.
Log in to vote