What is the point of rejecting or publishing reviews if they show up anyway?

Sometimes there’s a shred of info in them. Writer doesn’t get credit for them. It educates the masses what not to write. You don’t have to read them if you don’t want to. Evidence of who rejects everything. And finally, why not?

I had a similar thought, but it allows everyone to view the posting, the reasons for rejection, and draw their own conclusions. If you would like to get temporary free VIP for your review, then put some effort into writing an informative and original review.

What was the point of getting rid of paragraph breaks? Or having closed clubs listed right next to open clubs instead of at the bottom of the page like they used to be? Or not being able to access all comments/reviews from a profile page anymore? . Founder works in mysterious ways 😂

Did the review show up as rejected in the first place, or did it pop up after you read it as a pending review, and then rejected it?

The only time I've seen rejected reviews has been what I'm the 10th and last PL to review it. Then, it will show up as an already adjudicated review, but does not show up on subsequent club reviews.

I think this is a newer feature and not a good one. Like if a review gets rejected because it connects a dancer to an act that is illegal in that jurisdiction, it should not remain.

^ good point Ron!

I think it's good. there might be valid information within.

I'd rather just do away with the publishing of rejected reviews but would be satisfied with having them automatically drop off after 30 days. I'm not liking several of the new "tinkerings", and there are some "disappeared" features that I liked. Many of rejected reviews are egregiously deficient, reducing clutter helps.

I dont think the rejected reviews feature makes them feel important.. nor is that the intent

I think those that reject reviews that have important details lime who puts out and the level of extras available are losers.