AP: Killing nursing student out for run underscores fears of solo female athlete
mogul1985
I have 3 lives: Work, Dog Shows and Strip Clubs
https://www.bostonglobe.com/2024/02/26/n…
Got something to say?
Start your own discussion- Strip Club List
- What's New
- Reviews
- Top 40
- Articles
- Discussions
- Forums
- Unpublished Reviews
- Unpublished Articles
https://www.bostonglobe.com/2024/02/26/n…
26 comments
But....certainly, this situation demonstrates the tragic impact of not cracking down on illegal migrants. If he weren't here, she would still be alive.
Another story of a violent migrant in the US is the escapee in the Philly suburbs who had fled Brazil after killing a woman in Brazil, then killed his girlfriend in US. I don't recall whether he entered through the proper channel or not. If he entered legally, one needs to wonder why someone wanted for murder in Brazil was allowed here. But, that opens the question of how much information should be shared between countries? Do we want the Chinese government's hands, for example, in the records of our citizens?
Black on Black killing is not addressed by BLM and the Democrats, and other criminal behavior in the 'hood. The lack of crime control & strong punishment is horrendous.
Now that we are seeing the POTUS will probably not have Complete Immunity during office, family members may have standing when illegals commit murder and rape and trafficing when they are are known criminals and released.
Sinclair: I do fear we'll have another 911 event sooner than later. I have a good friend who works at NORTHCOM, former Army Lt Colonial, who does disaster planning. Plan all you want, as soon as it starts, everything changes when a lone wolf pack attacks.
Rep Katie Porter (D-CA) was saying this is being politicized by the GOP. She must have forgotten George Floyd. ONE DEATH, literally changed America with BLM. One person can make a difference, and Laken Riley's intentional must not be ignored, nor the 1,000s of Americans whose lives are being forcibly changed through death, violence, theft, and crime against their will.
America has seen some especially very dark days like post-Civil War. We found our way out, and I do hope we'll do it again - my glass is half-full, not half-empty.
Meanwhile, a bipartisan bill in the Senate that would have imposed tougher immigration and asylum laws was rejected by House Republicans. Apparently because Trump told them to, as it would hurt them in the election.
I conclude from this that Republican's main interest in this topic is for political gain.
The recent Senate bill was bipartisan. Those who worked on it deserve kudos. If Republicans are serious about making progress on illegal immigration they should be looking at it. When you have a divided government, sometimes you need to compromise to get things done.
LOL you probably got suckered by the Fox News spin on this like many others. Pelosi was referring to the fact that the House didn't have a Senate bill yet, they were urging the Senate to pass a bill so they (the House) could see what's in it. And importantly, show that it wasn't about death panels and a jobs killer and all the lies that Republicans tried to throw at it.
Years later, the ACA/Obamacare became so popular that Republicans not only couldn't repeal it, but they have now abandoned it as part of their agenda.
Really? James Lankford is a RINO? Wtf.
The Speaker said no Ukraine funding but we must have border protection. Schumer said, fine and Lankford got nearly everything he wanted into the bill. Never mind that republicans control only a slim majority in one half of congress they got nearly everything they’ve been asking for, for years.
The border bill was the strongest in 50 years. This is undisputed. The House rejected it because Mar A Lardo didn’t want the USA to get a win on Biden’s watch. This is undisputed.
Schumer said fine, then give me the Ukraine and Israel and Taiwan funding since the border is no longer a republican priority and the Speaker rejected it again, because it … had no border protection.
These are your representatives harming the USA in their own self interest.
Hmm … why would anyone not want to work against Russia and leave the border open? Couldn’t be so they’d get elected in November even if it hurts the USA, could it?
Give me a fucking break.
The same Dem/RINO crowd that voted for border security over and over in the mid-2000s yet the POTUD nothing (Bush and Obama); I will say Obama deported over 3M. Then Trump comes along as a huge surprise, says he'll do, and Congress does all they can to block his efforts, that today are now more important than ever. 30 years ago the slogan was, "It's the economy, stupid" so well coined by James Carvelle. Today, "It's ILLEGAL immigration, stupid." Now, the Dems are concerned, not 3 years ago when over 90 ExOs were created for Biden to sign to destroy what Trump was doing for Border control and remain in Mexico; if you think Biden created them, go have another ice cream cone. Yeah, it'll never ever be 100% locked down. However, visa over-stays and illegals need to be deported as soon as they are discovered. If we need "crop pickers" as Pelosi and Nadler said, fine, create a special worker program where non-citizens can come in for low-wage jobs we can't fill, track them, use eVerify, tax them (fed, state, SS, Medicare, Medicaid, City, what Americans in that area pay), have the employer pay for their health care costs. If they commit a crime of any sort even misdemeanors, back they go never to return.
^ As far as Pelosi goes, she said, "Congress has to pass the bill so you can find out what's in it, away from the fog of controversy." That "Fog of Controversy is debate, key to Democracy the Democrats preach they want to "save" from MAGA/Trump. https://www.usnews.com/opinion/blogs/pet…
Not one Republican voted for it in the Senate or House, not one. So when no Dems voted for HR 2, it's the same.
ObamaCare was crafted by SCJ Kagan before she was seated on the SC by Obama as a reward for ensuring ACA could not be overturned - parts have been. Premiums and medical costs have gone non-linear, as planned, to help crater all health care so gov't can step in and give us "Medicaid" (not Medicare) for all. Kagan has never recused herself whenever a challenge to ACA is presented to the SC. Had a Constitutional SCJ been faced with same, Chuck Schumer would be on the steps to the SC threatening them. We have two types of SCJs: Activists and Constitutionalists - you can decide for yourself who is who.
Huh. I thought you were going to argue against me? Instead you pointed out that the White House, the senate and about 2/3 of the House want to pass the bipartisan immigration law and Ukraine aid? So the fault lies with a minority of republicans who are shutting down the legislation while also running up to the government appropriations shutdown cliff? Interesting way to argue.
HR2 has no chance. It won’t get anywhere near 60 votes in the senate nor will Biden sign it. But sure, if you want to waste time you can encourage your congressman to hold out for its passage.
The Pelosi debate wasn’t my fight, but you’ve not addressed the difference between 2014 and now. In 2014, the dems had the White House, 60 seats in the senate!!!! and a majority in the House. That is not the same as now when the republicans have only a 7 seat house majority and they can’t agree on anything among themselves, let alone something that might actually be good for the country.
As for Obamacare, it’s the great white whale for republicans. They want to tear it down without regard for what it does right. I was an opponent of it in 2014 but even I can see the benefits of:
- no exclusion for pre existing conditions. Get laid off while you’re sick and tell me that’s not scary as hell without Obamacare
- coverage for dependents until age 26. I’ve got kids in grad school who are covered under my plan rather than having to work in school or borrow for coverage.
Lastly, if Obamacare is so bad why were there more people on it in 2023 than in any previous year? More than 40 million if you count the Medicaid expansion and other ACA related programs. McCain did rural republicans a huge favor by preventing its repeal when there was no safety net in place to cover all those rural people who need healthcare.
“I had a popular commentator that told me flat out, before they knew any of the contents of the bill, if you try to move a bill that solves the border crisis during this presidential year, I will do whatever I can to destroy you, because I do not want you to solve this during the presidential election,” the Oklahoma Republican continued.
^ The cost of Obamacare has skyrocketed premiums and over all costs. To address people who lose jobs could be covered by state or federal plans as part of Unemployment. Going after the entire system wasn't needed. What we really need was insurance for Major Medical, and an annual physical - not every "sniffle" visit to the doc. The end goal of ObamaCare is still to have it crater from expenses and have gov't do a complete Medicaid takeover. Then, we'll get rationed healthcare that will worsen care. If ObamaCare was so great, why was it passed deceitfully? Obamacare architect MIT Econ Professor Jonathan Gruber said "Obamacare only passed due to the "stupidity" of the American voter and a lack of "transparency," https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nzbhbetw…
Sure, a lot of people benefited, however, this didn't need to affect 100% of the population who liked their insurance - private or personal.
—
Isn’t that how the Cubans infiltrated the US from Mexico in the original Red Dawn. Never saw the remake with the Koreans.