FOSTA SESTA is Trumps best policy

Troll.

Well it did bring FSSW into strip clubs right?

No hookers have always worked in clubs. But is fosta sesta a reason many of you support Trump so much?

Lets get more hookers

Is Trump the one who set up FOSTA SESTA, nothing like that before he?

SJG

There were always anti trafficking laws but Trump is responsible for fosta sesta

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stop_Enabl…

But Sex Trafficking is defined so broadly that that probably is unconstitutional. But I would not want to be someone who gets hit with it. I am totally then opposed to FOSTA SESTA.

SJG

TJ Street
https://tuscl.net/photo.php?id=3560
https://tuscl.net/photo.php?id=2305

^^^ Because of Fosta Sesta, the operators of Portland's Xotispot bailed out, they got scared. That was a huge loss. and there was no trafficking there. It was just like a facebook for strippers, and where the club's pages could show the roster and be linked to the girls' profiles.

SJG

It was more than that. There are very specific precepts imvolved with trafficking and yes it is complex akd goes beyond just sexual exploitation.

But the crime has no read definition, so Fosta is a huge problem.

SJG

There are clear definitions. Its only a problem to those trying to do something illegal.

Not true, there are no clear definitions, and it is about trying to know what is in someone's head.

Really abusing people is already unlawful. It is a redundant bully law.

SJG

It's pretty clear. Legislation always is.

No, what constitutes trafficking is defined way too broadly, not defined at all. Same for the Traficking and Violence Against Women act from the Dubya Bush era.

SJG

Daniel Castro - I'll Play The Blues For You
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ioOzsi9a…

Slow Blues/ Blues Ballads 1 - A two hour long compilation
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V8oaxsHC…

A lot of things fall under trafficking to make it broadly enforceable. But the law is pretty straightforward

No it is not. Read in a book about this, a stock broker spends 1/2 his time in the US, doing his trading. Then the other half cashed out and resting in India. Is he a trafficking victim? And if he talks with people on an online forum about all this, is the forum operator a criminal?

SJG

Trump's separation families at US-Mexico border amounts to torture, doctors say
https://thehill.com/changing-america/res…

Full Report
https://phr.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/…

Daniel Castro - I'll Play The Blues For You
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ioOzsi9a…

Slow Blues/ Blues Ballads 1 - A two hour long compilation
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V8oaxsHC…

TJ Street
https://tuscl.net/photos/5d699507cd73c
https://tuscl.net/photo.php?id=1061

Thats a ridiculous example. The law clearly states what trafficking is

Show me

SJG

https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-cong…

You can look the act up and read it

"relating to sexual exploitation of children or sex trafficking"

Sex trafficking means whatever they want it to mean, like driving a stripper GF to work, or using online to tell her about a new club.

SJG

It means what the law prescribes

Nigga.

Prostitution is amazing and I want it to be more widespread 😋😋😋😋

Its already everywhere

You know what the Trafficking Law is, its our version of the Mann Act.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mann_Act

The last person they tried to prosecute under it was Charlie Chaplin.

They are just making sex and sexual liaisons unlawful.

Now with the "Trafficking" concept, no state lines or national borders need to be crossed.

And with Fosta, the entire crime can be in cyberspace.

They can bust whom ever they want anytime.

SJG

TJ Street
https://tuscl.net/photos/5d699507cd73c
https://tuscl.net/photo.php?id=1061
https://tuscl.net/photo.php?id=3513
https://tuscl.net/photo.php?id=3560
https://tuscl.net/photo.php?id=2305
https://tuscl.net/photos/5cbf9f521a3ae

Graham Bond ✪ Holy Magick [full album]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G0Exbl-S…

Grahame Bond - Love Is the Law [full album / bonus tracks]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wyg8x36f…

M Davis Bitches Brew 1970 Full Album
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=50fB5L1v…

Its not about sex though and even if prostitution were decriminalized solicitation wouldn't be

No, the Trafficking laws are only applied when there is somehow sex. The Mann Act criminalized anyone who transports a woman, not their wife, "for immoral purpose". The Trafficking laws and the online version, Fosta, is the same thing.

SJG

Trafficking applies to people trafgicked for cheap labor domestic servitude adoption etc as well. Its not just about prostitution and sex slavery

The laws are never enforced unless it is sexual.

And then I gave the example of the bi-national stock broker. People only get exercised about it when it is sexual.

It is really the same thing as the Mann Act, trying to legislate sexual morality.

SJG

No theyre enforced even when it isn't. Your example wasn't human trafficking

No one enforces trafficking laws when they are not sexual.

And the Mann Act amounted to the same thing. Fortunately now thrown into the trash bin of our history.

SJG

They do. Slavery is addressed

Show me a case where the Trafficking and violence against women act is being enforced which is not sexual.

And the basic form of trafficking, according to that law, does not have to involve m*n*rs, force, fraud, or coercion. And there are no specified lines you have to cross. It carries a 10 year penalty, and sex workers will be encouraged to claim it to get their T and U Visas. They only have to claim moderate distress, not anything extreme.

4 part series, and she had to claim nearly nothing.
https://www.sfgate.com/news/article/DIAR…

The Mann Act was used completely recklessly, trying to regulate adult consensual sexual behavior, used against Charlie Chaplin. Started with totally unsubstantiated rumors of "White Slavery", mostly just driven by anti-Chinese prejudice.

SJG

General anti trafficking laws do it.

Yes, but these laws are really just based on prejudice and sexual moralisms. Like the Mann Act they could be found to be unconstitutional.

SJG

The Mann act was amended. Its not what it was in the early 1900s

It is no longer used. I think the last was Charlie Chaplin.

But it, like Fosta was always a bum deal, stupid law, just bullying.

Saying that adult women cannot consent to sex work.

Then anyone who has contact with them could be charged.

SJG

You can't consent to illegal labor.

People can consent to anything. But if you mean that some rights are considered so basic that they cannot be signed away, true.

But FOSTA SESTA is just stupid law, giving LE great power when no crime has been defined.

T-RUMP was spreading ass for the Right of his own party.

SJG

But it clearly defines the crime.

Negative, Fosta Sesta is far removed from actual prostitution. It is totally unclear who is and who is not subject to the law.

SJG

It is clear

Negative, anyone who is communicating with mobile sex workers could be charged with a major federal felony.

SJG