I think you should be able to link girl with extras. We need to know which girls are more open to certain services. To me, protective of names is a little white Knight-ish to me. If you are telling people to physically harm her ......that is one thing. That is a no no
Name with services, personality, telling people that she if she is a ROB, OTC options should be a yes.
@SCmania77 If she’s a ROB by all means out her, but don’t do fucked up shit that can cause a gal that gave you a good time to have problems that’s not being a white knight that’s being a fuckn braggart, and a prick.
$1000 for an hour ? Well, he did me a favor by warning me not to go to Rachel's. But I agree that it should have been rejected for giving the girl's name out.
The stupidity never ends. The owner of my old favorite club has been posting comments on reviews without identifying herself as owner. She is actively condemning extras and the old way the club did things. If you think nobody who matters is reading reviews, you’re an idiot.
Hey folks, this is tuscl, not TER. "Reviewer" just joined site with subject review as their first and only contribution. He/she could easily have been a jealous dancer or a disgruntled club employee whose advances subject dancer rejected.
No info on the club itself and too much info on what went on with the dancer...all in their one and only review in their first month as a member. I call bullshit...and it shouldn't have been approved.
We have a sizable minority who agree with SCMania that extras girls should be advertised to the rest of the board. I understand the point, but we can have it both ways if you just use the pm system. Everyone wins.
I'm not completely sure he wasn't embellishing - I haven't read of too much mileage going on in that club but then again most reviewers are not gonna shell out that kinda $$$ but given this club's highbrow M.O. I wonder if the rooms have cameras negating this type of action.
But it’s really not ok bro think about it that girl if it’s a true review shows him a good time he doesn’t need to be a prick and put her at risk so he can brag about it, I think that’s a scumbag move and super inconsiderate
I agree with you 25. But, there are a lot of members who don’t. I think they are in the minority, but there are a lot of them. Many of them don’t want to change no matter how many times you, I or any number of other members tell them they are wrong. They won’t be convinced. Since I won’t change their mind, I tried to get them to see the wisdom of the pm. I’ll share extras info with a member I know is real. A few of us Marylanders do so. Nothing formal, just messaging about reviews but there is some good info exchanged. Who’s dancing when and where. Changes at clubs. All sorts of stuff. Not so much extras anymore since our city clubs have gone downhill, but back in the day that stuff as well. It works.
I think info linking providers to extras should be prohibited/restricted. A gentlemen never tells. Doing otherwise is just being an @$$hole/dick - not the good kind either. You can be both an alpha and a gentlemen.
A lot of women are already afraid of being taken advantage of, outed, shamed by needy, controlling stalkers.
There’s plenty of advice on negotiating with a provider up front so both parties know and agree on what to expect. Basically the same advice on every similar forum. Fail to read and heed advice and recommendations, then I believe you deserve to get taken and learn a life lesson from the school of hard knocks.
I was one of the three VIP members who recommended publication of this review. In truth, I was so astounded, no appalled, at the exorbitant prices reported in this brief review that I completely overlooked the dancer's name. Normally, I do not recommend linking a dancer's name with any details about extras, unless it is a public service announcement warning readers about a ROB.
On further reflection, maybe this one is OK to include the dancer's name. Based on these prices, we have two ROBs (the dancer and the club both charged exorbitant prices, thus taking advantage of a clueless customer) Also, the club must surely be aware of the manner in which the dancer is selling private dances and grateful for the rental income. Thus, we have two ROBs (the club and the dancer) and one fool, the OP (as in the old expression "a fool and his money are soon parted"). Of course, if the OP can afford these prices, maybe he is just wealthy and not really a fool, but he is surely a contributor to strip club inflation.
The club is upscale and a 7up club - may have the best collection of dancers looks-wise of any South FL club - thus the high-prices are somewhat justified - more of a club for the country-club crowd vs the avg SCer
Slippery slope. Rob; take property unlawfully from (a person or place) by force or threat of force, informal steal, informal overcharge (someone) for something. There’s nothing in his post to indicate he was actually robbed was sold a bait-and-switch et al.
I may not think a Bugatti Chiron is worth $3M, a Gulfstream 650 is worth $50M, or a Chris Ruth Tomahawk Ribeye is worth $119, etc. Apparently, some people do, can afford it and happily pay for those things knowing the cost and alternatives. In fact, it seemed OP was one of these people according to his review.
$500/hr for a dancer’s time, even for non extras isn’t that big of a deal. :o Maybe not “TUSCL preferred” but there are men who pay it.
And looking at men brag about when they get extras at a price point lower or equal to the typical for a club environment...is compelling case for perhaps why a dancer should charge at above market value for extras. Gives him less of a reason to go bragging.
White knight technically means a person or thing that come to someone's aid. However, talk to any woman and I doubt she’ll be afraid of anyone who unselfishly, protects her without expectations that she owes them anything in return.
Women are afraid of people who offer help with ulterior motives where they actually try to take advantage of her, control, manipulate, stalk, want points for being nice, become jealous, and or expect that she owes them something in return.
The fact he got a whole hour does make a difference - most PLs wouldn't opt for an hour if they gotta pay that much but if one is able to enjoy the whole hour then yeah not a bad price for the amount of time and quality of club - the $450 room-fee is a killer but certain clubs charge a lot for the room - I don't think I could in good PL-conscience pay that much just for the room - but I could see paying $500 for a top-bitch I just wouldn't do it often.
That club ( Rachel's ) in West Palm Beach is expensive, by most standards, but in their defense the club is very upscale, and they have some world class pretty ladies there.
I'm in the camp that believes we shouldn't be listing names of dancers with specific extras in a review. Its never a good idea and could just create problems for her with management or douche bags expecting the same treatment. YMMV with certain dancers depending on the night, money spent, the vibe you have with her or her mood. This is not an escort review site. So unless she told you to go advertise for her, dont put it in a review. If someone wants that info, you can always PM the OP and they can choose to share it with PLs they trust.
Others keep referring to past reviews posted that list dancers with certain acts, and yes there are reviews on here that do that, but alot of them were reviews that were posted almost automaticly when no one was reviewing or voting on them.
Now if she is a ROB, then yes give us her name so we know who to avoid.
501 - it’s not only the past reviews. Whenever this topic comes up on the forum, there are always a few members who post that they want names of girls who provide extras to be posted. Their minds won’t be changed.
@Kaj- That's a RUTH CHRIS ribeye you're thinking about. You must have drank too much wine when you posted. E-man, that's a lame rationalization for listing a dancers name. She allegedly delivered the goods as promised, just charged a high price. Thus it's on the dude for accepting the price and paying up. You also need to read the reviews more carefully. The fact that it's shockingly expensive leads me to believe that this is a story concocted to hurt the subject dancer.
I'm in the don't link dancer name to specific acts, keep it at trusted PM level camp.
Minnow: I acknowledge that it was a rationalization for my oversight. But not completely lame as others should be warned about the high prices so that they are informed customers. That warning could have happened without the dancer's name. I have visited this club and I know that the prices she quoted are typical of the other dancers.
I think it’s pretty well documented that Rachel’s in West Palm Beach is extremely expensive, should be obvious by reading the reviews as well as the fact that there just aren’t a lot of reviews. The folks that go there are drawn from a bunch of super wealthy communities that are within 15 minutes of this club.
Comments
last commentyeah, he linked her name to extras which is a no no
And besides that, it’s just a really lame review
Log in to vote
^ yeah I meant to say too much of the rong information.
Log in to vote
He didn't spell anything rong.
Log in to vote
I think you should be able to link girl with extras. We need to know which girls are more open to certain services. To me, protective of names is a little white Knight-ish to me. If you are telling people to physically harm her ......that is one thing. That is a no no
Name with services, personality, telling people that she if she is a ROB, OTC options should be a yes.
Log in to vote
^ That's what PMs are for.
Log in to vote
@SCmania77 If she’s a ROB by all means out her, but don’t do fucked up shit that can cause a gal that gave you a good time to have problems that’s not being a white knight that’s being a fuckn braggart, and a prick.
Log in to vote
I rejected it for being too explicit with a remark "Dancer name".
Log in to vote
$1000 for an hour ? Well, he did me a favor by warning me not to go to Rachel's. But I agree that it should have been rejected for giving the girl's name out.
Log in to vote
The stupidity never ends. The owner of my old favorite club has been posting comments on reviews without identifying herself as owner. She is actively condemning extras and the old way the club did things. If you think nobody who matters is reading reviews, you’re an idiot.
Log in to vote
^+1
Log in to vote
Hey folks, this is tuscl, not TER. "Reviewer" just joined site with subject review as their first and only contribution. He/she could easily have been a jealous dancer or a disgruntled club employee whose advances subject dancer rejected.
Log in to vote
^ that might be true but still that girl is being tagged and might have repercussions because of a review a nonstarter in my book.
Log in to vote
True, Minnow. It could also be a legit review by someone who didn’t know better and didn’t read the review guidelines. Either way it’s a problem. IMO
Log in to vote
No info on the club itself and too much info on what went on with the dancer...all in their one and only review in their first month as a member. I call bullshit...and it shouldn't have been approved.
Log in to vote
He didn't mention if valet parking was required.
Log in to vote
He never mentioned whether his beer was $6.50 or $6.75!!
Log in to vote
We have a sizable minority who agree with SCMania that extras girls should be advertised to the rest of the board. I understand the point, but we can have it both ways if you just use the pm system. Everyone wins.
Log in to vote
^+2
Log in to vote
@JimmyMcNutty was that your version of cant we all just get along ;)
Log in to vote
I'm not completely sure he wasn't embellishing - I haven't read of too much mileage going on in that club but then again most reviewers are not gonna shell out that kinda $$$ but given this club's highbrow M.O. I wonder if the rooms have cameras negating this type of action.
Log in to vote
25 - sorta. I just think it’s lazy to not see the other side and try out something that benefits all. It’s my moderate side. ;)
Log in to vote
But it’s really not ok bro think about it that girl if it’s a true review shows him a good time he doesn’t need to be a prick and put her at risk so he can brag about it, I think that’s a scumbag move and super inconsiderate
Log in to vote
I agree with you 25. But, there are a lot of members who don’t. I think they are in the minority, but there are a lot of them. Many of them don’t want to change no matter how many times you, I or any number of other members tell them they are wrong. They won’t be convinced. Since I won’t change their mind, I tried to get them to see the wisdom of the pm. I’ll share extras info with a member I know is real. A few of us Marylanders do so. Nothing formal, just messaging about reviews but there is some good info exchanged. Who’s dancing when and where. Changes at clubs. All sorts of stuff. Not so much extras anymore since our city clubs have gone downhill, but back in the day that stuff as well. It works.
Log in to vote
I think info linking providers to extras should be prohibited/restricted. A gentlemen never tells. Doing otherwise is just being an @$$hole/dick - not the good kind either. You can be both an alpha and a gentlemen.
A lot of women are already afraid of being taken advantage of, outed, shamed by needy, controlling stalkers.
There’s plenty of advice on negotiating with a provider up front so both parties know and agree on what to expect. Basically the same advice on every similar forum. Fail to read and heed advice and recommendations, then I believe you deserve to get taken and learn a life lesson from the school of hard knocks.
Log in to vote
I was one of the three VIP members who recommended publication of this review. In truth, I was so astounded, no appalled, at the exorbitant prices reported in this brief review that I completely overlooked the dancer's name. Normally, I do not recommend linking a dancer's name with any details about extras, unless it is a public service announcement warning readers about a ROB.
On further reflection, maybe this one is OK to include the dancer's name. Based on these prices, we have two ROBs (the dancer and the club both charged exorbitant prices, thus taking advantage of a clueless customer) Also, the club must surely be aware of the manner in which the dancer is selling private dances and grateful for the rental income. Thus, we have two ROBs (the club and the dancer) and one fool, the OP (as in the old expression "a fool and his money are soon parted"). Of course, if the OP can afford these prices, maybe he is just wealthy and not really a fool, but he is surely a contributor to strip club inflation.
Log in to vote
The club is upscale and a 7up club - may have the best collection of dancers looks-wise of any South FL club - thus the high-prices are somewhat justified - more of a club for the country-club crowd vs the avg SCer
Log in to vote
Slippery slope. Rob; take property unlawfully from (a person or place) by force or threat of force, informal steal, informal overcharge (someone) for something. There’s nothing in his post to indicate he was actually robbed was sold a bait-and-switch et al.
I may not think a Bugatti Chiron is worth $3M, a Gulfstream 650 is worth $50M, or a Chris Ruth Tomahawk Ribeye is worth $119, etc. Apparently, some people do, can afford it and happily pay for those things knowing the cost and alternatives. In fact, it seemed OP was one of these people according to his review.
Log in to vote
$500/hr for a dancer’s time, even for non extras isn’t that big of a deal. :o Maybe not “TUSCL preferred” but there are men who pay it.
And looking at men brag about when they get extras at a price point lower or equal to the typical for a club environment...is compelling case for perhaps why a dancer should charge at above market value for extras. Gives him less of a reason to go bragging.
Log in to vote
(By market value, I mean a similarly attractive escort in the same region)
Log in to vote
Take all their Taco Bell money spicey! Make sure they are too broke to get Taco Bell on their way home. Then you are doing it right
Log in to vote
White knight technically means a person or thing that come to someone's aid. However, talk to any woman and I doubt she’ll be afraid of anyone who unselfishly, protects her without expectations that she owes them anything in return.
Women are afraid of people who offer help with ulterior motives where they actually try to take advantage of her, control, manipulate, stalk, want points for being nice, become jealous, and or expect that she owes them something in return.
Log in to vote
The fact he got a whole hour does make a difference - most PLs wouldn't opt for an hour if they gotta pay that much but if one is able to enjoy the whole hour then yeah not a bad price for the amount of time and quality of club - the $450 room-fee is a killer but certain clubs charge a lot for the room - I don't think I could in good PL-conscience pay that much just for the room - but I could see paying $500 for a top-bitch I just wouldn't do it often.
Log in to vote
That club ( Rachel's ) in West Palm Beach is expensive, by most standards, but in their defense the club is very upscale, and they have some world class pretty ladies there.
Log in to vote
I'm in the camp that believes we shouldn't be listing names of dancers with specific extras in a review. Its never a good idea and could just create problems for her with management or douche bags expecting the same treatment. YMMV with certain dancers depending on the night, money spent, the vibe you have with her or her mood. This is not an escort review site. So unless she told you to go advertise for her, dont put it in a review. If someone wants that info, you can always PM the OP and they can choose to share it with PLs they trust.
Others keep referring to past reviews posted that list dancers with certain acts, and yes there are reviews on here that do that, but alot of them were reviews that were posted almost automaticly when no one was reviewing or voting on them.
Now if she is a ROB, then yes give us her name so we know who to avoid.
Log in to vote
501 - it’s not only the past reviews. Whenever this topic comes up on the forum, there are always a few members who post that they want names of girls who provide extras to be posted. Their minds won’t be changed.
Log in to vote
@Kaj- That's a RUTH CHRIS ribeye you're thinking about. You must have drank too much wine when you posted. E-man, that's a lame rationalization for listing a dancers name. She allegedly delivered the goods as promised, just charged a high price. Thus it's on the dude for accepting the price and paying up. You also need to read the reviews more carefully. The fact that it's shockingly expensive leads me to believe that this is a story concocted to hurt the subject dancer.
I'm in the don't link dancer name to specific acts, keep it at trusted PM level camp.
Log in to vote
Minnow: I acknowledge that it was a rationalization for my oversight. But not completely lame as others should be warned about the high prices so that they are informed customers. That warning could have happened without the dancer's name. I have visited this club and I know that the prices she quoted are typical of the other dancers.
Log in to vote
I think it’s pretty well documented that Rachel’s in West Palm Beach is extremely expensive, should be obvious by reading the reviews as well as the fact that there just aren’t a lot of reviews. The folks that go there are drawn from a bunch of super wealthy communities that are within 15 minutes of this club.
Log in to vote
^ Yeah, I never miss the place whenever I spend the night in WPB.
Log in to vote
^ seriously;)
Log in to vote
I've never spent the night in WPB
Log in to vote
^LOL
Log in to vote
There might be nothing wrong with a post review modification process that turns Melody into M*****.
Log in to vote