Sugar baby does not equal whore?

I know i could have just thrown this as a comment on my stripper/whore article, but that one's already grown bigger than it has any right to be so i just thought i would add this observation on its own. Having recently perused the literally handful or two of new topics or posts even, that have marinated, for lack of a better word, over the last few weeks (which is about how long it takes to add a decent number of new topics) on the entire SW site (outside of the camming forum which remains quite popular but the least interesting to stripper fans), i noticed that even on stripperweb, where absolutely none of the girls are whores or do extras or OTC, almost all of them will be supportive of a stripper talking about or asking about how to deal with their sugardaddy (whom i'm guessing they don't do extras with him or have sex with him OTC based on how the girls otherwise like to portray themselves, yeah right).

In almost all cases, the stripper isn't naturally or initially attracted to the much older SD outside of his wallet, but generally tolerates him because of his regular and consistent money and gifts although the sex apparently isn't that bad (for the girl of course, for the guy i'm sure it's awesome), so he's not really comparable to a rich and generous civilian boyfriend, as well as the fact that many if not most SDs are already married. But they are generally much more accepting of this type of pay4play relationship/arrangement. So i guess not all whores are equal nor are all johns. Of course this should be obvious.