Sugar baby does not equal whore?
theDirkDiggler
Illinois
I know i could have just thrown this as a comment on my stripper/whore article, but that one's already grown bigger than it has any right to be so i just thought i would add this observation on its own. Having recently perused the literally handful or two of new topics or posts even, that have marinated, for lack of a better word, over the last few weeks (which is about how long it takes to add a decent number of new topics) on the entire SW site (outside of the camming forum which remains quite popular but the least interesting to stripper fans), i noticed that even on stripperweb, where absolutely none of the girls are whores or do extras or OTC, almost all of them will be supportive of a stripper talking about or asking about how to deal with their sugardaddy (whom i'm guessing they don't do extras with him or have sex with him OTC based on how the girls otherwise like to portray themselves, yeah right).
In almost all cases, the stripper isn't naturally or initially attracted to the much older SD outside of his wallet, but generally tolerates him because of his regular and consistent money and gifts although the sex apparently isn't that bad (for the girl of course, for the guy i'm sure it's awesome), so he's not really comparable to a rich and generous civilian boyfriend, as well as the fact that many if not most SDs are already married. But they are generally much more accepting of this type of pay4play relationship/arrangement. So i guess not all whores are equal nor are all johns. Of course this should be obvious.
In almost all cases, the stripper isn't naturally or initially attracted to the much older SD outside of his wallet, but generally tolerates him because of his regular and consistent money and gifts although the sex apparently isn't that bad (for the girl of course, for the guy i'm sure it's awesome), so he's not really comparable to a rich and generous civilian boyfriend, as well as the fact that many if not most SDs are already married. But they are generally much more accepting of this type of pay4play relationship/arrangement. So i guess not all whores are equal nor are all johns. Of course this should be obvious.
Got something to say?
Start your own discussion
9 comments
That said, there is a consistency to how the girls look at extras, versus SA or escorts. The stance is that strip clubs are for stripping only, and extras shouldn't be in the strip club ... but that having sex in an area of the sex industry where sex is expected, like escorting, sensual massage, or SD/SB, is ok. They don't put down the escorts or "bodyrub" girls, either, just strippers who do extras
The ones that are good with (or even eager to, because they are sexual freaks) dating multiple guys pull the wool over their own eyes a lot less. They know good and well they are having sex for money.
My current SB calls herself a whore all the time, makes it clear she might be seeing other guys, and talks about how she and all her friends loved finding SA cause now they could make money off all the sex they used to just give away for free. They probably think using SA puts them just a notch above a regular whore, since the SB culture allows for meet-and-greet dates before any money-for-sex dates, so the girls can be choosier.
In my case, I believe I'm getting away with smaller gifts because my SB seems to like me a lot.
That's why the meet-and-greet dates are useful as a preview. And I've had two meet and greet dates turn into free sex preview dates