Dancer profiles are now available! Free VIP for dancers, apply now. More info

Advertisement
Front Room

Sampling vs. Plagarism

motorhead
motorhead1106928

Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life

10 yrs ago · 1 min read

Compare.

Why no outcry?

And

Replies (3)

Profile picture for san_jose_guy
san_jose_guy

There are established standards for what is sampling and what is plagiarism, but I don't know that they are.

SJG

Shaft Drive Bicycles glendalecycles.com

Asian Eye Makeup 1.bp.blogspot.com

Profile picture for JamesSD
JamesSD

In general a sample is like a citation; everyone knows where it came from, or you're explicit. In music plagiarism would be Bittersweet Symphony, which ripped off the Rolling Stones and lost in court. Ice Ice Baby managed to rip off Under Pressure but get away with it, probably because it was a rap and the law was different then. The Beastie Boys couldn't release License to Ill today without huge royalty payments.

Anyways, if Mrs. Trump had copied a speech from Nancy Reagan, everyone would have shrugged. But the Republican party hated Michelle Obama.

Profile picture for Hugh_G_Rection
Hugh_G_Rection

I'm not a copyright attorney but I believe the standard for an 'original' work in fiction or music is if over 20% of it is obviously derivative its not an original work. I could be wrong on that.

A political speech however is probably more like a research paper which requires you to cite your references. Why shouldn't the press make the call if this sounds quoted verbatim from the present first lady, especially when the Trump campaign is running as political outsiders asserting that the system is broken and the party in control of the White House (which First Lady Michelle O'Bama spoke to and for) is at fault for American Decline? Mrs. Trump chose to make this a talking point without giving credit where credit was due.

Join the conversation

Sign in to reply to this discussion.

Advertisement