Customers admitting they PAY STRIPPERS FOR SEXUAL SERVICES while strippers NOT

I think that definition of "legal contract called marriage" expired in 1950.

I have wondered why the women suffer such social stigmatization for selling sex, when obviously men do buy it. Perhaps a bit of underlying anger is the reason, since most of us expect the ladies to "love us for ourselves", and provide sex for free. Well, in the legal contract called marriage, a man is required to provide monetary support for his wife, and the wife is required to provide sexual intimacy for the husband. If either party does not provide, that is legal grounds for a divorce. Paying for sex can also be called marriage, you just have to pay the preacher too...:-)

Because all the customers go to the same stripper? Seriously, what's your point?

Perhaps there is a more of a stigma to selling sexual services than to buying sexual services--sorta like buying drugs vs. selling drugs. Or perhaps it has to do with differing social expectation for men and women. It is zero accomplishment for most women to get sex while for most men they needed to work a little harder. Anyway there could be lots of different reasons like the previous poster pointing out that perhaps the all the buyers are going to the same seller. Word of mouth rewards good service. :)

SuperDude just misses it. It's evidence that the line between "typical" S.C. visitors and those of us that walk out with phone numbers and action both inside and OTC is all about how those of us that see things differently. DavidS and Chitown GET IT and know the difference.

All relationships with all women are about money. Marriage is glorified. Selling it is illegal. It's the same.

Is it just me or do all of RomanticLover's questions seem like a gathering of data for a book or some sort of study? I constantly see questions, but very little commentary.

What about this?