tuscl

Porn dangers (other than going blind)

Thursday, April 11, 2013 6:00 AM
.. Are All Porn Sites Really Riddled with Malware? Pornographic websites, or at least some of them, contain a lot of malware that could infect visitors, a British researcher has found. That contradicts two earlier studies, which concluded that porn sites were actually less — or at least no more — riddled with malware than general-interest websites. Traditional wisdom holds that porn sites are some of the most frequent purveyors of system-impairing malware. This notion is not always false (just visit a few porn sites if you're skeptical), but according to IT expert Conrad Longmore, it's not always true, either. Six out of 10 of the Web's most popular porn sites are squeaky-clean, and of the remaining four, the infection rates are still relatively low. Longmore analyzed metrics for 10 popular porn sites. He catalogued each site's relative risk, the number of a site's infected pages compared with its number of total pages and the amount of users who click on any given page. From these statistics, Longmore calculated the probability of contracting malware from visiting each site. The results were more encouraging than Longmore expected. Porn sites [view link], [view link], [view link], [view link], [view link], and [view link] earned a 0 percent risk rating. In contrast, a well-known site referencing a male sex function earned 2 percent, [view link] earned 14 percent, xhamster earned 42 percent and [view link] scored a staggering 53 percent. In other words, if you consume porn from [view link], you are more than likely to come away with something unpleasant on your system. These sites are probably not to blame for attempting to infect users with malware; after all, compromised users will not (or cannot) return to the site to provide additional hits. Similarly, advertisers are not likely to employ malware, since it would render their sites unusable. Instead, Longmore theorizes that third-party intermediary sites are to blame. Sites such as [view link], [view link] and [view link] facilitate links between various porn sites, and disseminate malware as they link from place to place. One year ago, Symantec found that only 2.4 percent of porn sites were infected, while nearly 20 percent of blogs were. Two months ago, Cisco found that general-interest websites had higher infection rates than "fringe" sites, thanks to corrupted ad networks. This study does not suggest that porn sites are entirely safe, but perhaps their bad reputation is not wholly deserved. Browse safely, but by all means, go ahead and browse.

6 comments

  • shadowcat
    11 years ago
    Glad to see that [view link] had a zero risk factor. I use it 99% of the time.
  • crazyjoe
    11 years ago
    Some of those sites try to fuck eveyone
  • SuperDude
    11 years ago
    Sites featuring nudes of Amber Rose (a curvy hip-hop hottie)have real mean malware. The malware is a phony FBI page threatening the user with federal ciminal prosecution if a $300.00 "fine" is not paid immedately over the internet.
  • Alucard
    11 years ago
    Going into Bankruptcy. LOL
  • emmett
    11 years ago
    You should be doing your -- uhh -- private browsing from a Linux virtual machine. More privacy, much better protection against malware (basically immune), and if something really does go wrong, throw it out and create a new one.
  • sharkhunter
    11 years ago
    If it wasn't for malware, I might have thought I wasted my money buying anti virus software. I have seen regular sites have malware if you ever do a lot of quick web surfing without caring too much where you're going.
You must be a member to leave a comment.Join Now
Got something to say?
Start your own discussion