Psychology and the Me Generation

jerikson40
New York
Clearly there are a number of people here who get visibly annoyed when others discuss psychology and/or analyzing stripper behavior. Not sure why, other than maybe they don't understand it and can't look smart in the discussions so they denigrate it, but anyway...

I find it real interesting to figure out why people do what they do. And I have a topic for discussion that involves some psychology, so if it annoys you don't bother reading. And there's a lot of stuff to read, so if reading stuff gives you a headache it's probably best you just move on to another thread.

Anyway, some of us were raised in the Baby Boomer generation, which was also called the "Me Generation". Which, IMO, was a fairly well deserved label. We had the hippies who were all about "self-fulfillment" and communal living, where they welched off of someone with money and didn't do any work, and cared only about taking drugs for their own benefit.

After the Baby Boomers (born in the '40's, '50's, and 1960's) were the Generation X'ers (born in the 1960's thru 1980's), followed by the Millenials (born in 1980's thru 2000's). Which means the current crop of strippers are Millenials, probably born around the late 1980's or early 1990's.

Now what I've noticed in the years since the internet and cellphones and technology became super important in the Millenial generation is the widespread belief that people who are really into this technology (which makes Facebook and texting and networking possible) are seen as very social and networked and with lots of "friends".

I've always felt that the opposite is true. I've always believed that if Baby Boomers are the "Me Generation", then Millenials are the "You mean there are other people??" Generation. People spend hours and hours alone at their computers or with their noses buried in their cellphones, not interacting with people in person.

And in reality, in my view, all of this technology gives them nothing more than entertainment. Ways to goof online, and share stupid videos of a cat playing the piano, and joking with your 'buddies' via text about what a dork your Science teacher is. It's not about getting personal and connected with real friends, nor is it about using the internet for learning and other honorable endeavors. It's about goofing around with people you've never met so you don't have to get off your butt and deal with real people in real life. And it's about having an outlet where everyone can say stuff and give their opinions, which nobody else really cares about or listens to.

Anyway, there is a recent book entitled "Generation Me" which cites a number of studies that conclude that, according to the author, "Pop­u­lar views of the mil­len­ni­al genera­t­ion, born in the 1980s and 1990s, as more car­ing, com­mun­ity-oriented and pol­i­tic­ally en­gaged than pre­vi­ous genera­t­ions are largely in­cor­rect, par­tic­u­larly when com­pared to ba­by boomers and Genera­t­ion X at the same age,” said the stu­dy's lead au­thor, Jean Twenge, a psy­chol­o­gist at San Die­go State Uni­vers­ity and au­thor of the book Genera­t­ion Me. “These da­ta show that re­cent genera­t­ions are less likely to em­brace com­mun­ity mind­ed­ness and are fo­cus­ing more on mon­ey, im­age and fame.”

Now my intent is not to rag on young people, just to point out that there seems to be an interesting trend that might help our understanding of how and why young people, including strippers, act. Especially when you see conclusions like this:

"...the pro­por­tion of stu­dents who said be­ing wealthy was very im­por­tant to them rose from 45 per­cent for ba­by boomers (sur­veyed be­tween 1966 and 1978) to 70 per­cent for Genera­t­ion Xers (sur­veyed be­tween 1979 and 1999) and 75 per­cent for mil­len­ni­als (sur­veyed be­tween 2000 and 2009)."

So if you notice that strippers seem self involved, acting rude because they're locked into their cellphones, and only interested in money, then you might understand why.

Again, I'm not ragging on young folks. In fact, we all know of some wonderful young folks, including strippers. But this is merely a discussion of generational trends across many people.

34 comments

Jump to latest
motorhead
12 years ago
I like the fact young folks embrace technology. One of my favorites just posted a web cam video of herself on pornhub that YouTube banned.
jester214
12 years ago
You say your not ragging on young people but you've just put forth the idea, and appear to concur, that everyone between the age of 13 and 32 is greedy and self-absorbed and spends all there time goofing off online (interest given the medium your using to suggest this).

No offense but psychological discussions are best left for psychologists, not a bunch of strip club customers who routinely make sweeping generalizations and demonstrate an almost total lack of willingness to change their opinions.
Dougster
12 years ago
I think jestie is just scared of people gaining psychological knowledge because it is so blatant that he is PAPD and he doesn't want this to be too widely known.
jerikson40
12 years ago
Jester, if you don't like the conclusions the author and the associated studies reach, then I suggest you argue with the author if the book, as well as the authors of the studies she cites in the book. I'm not a psychologist, but I have at least some ability to look at the results of studies, compare that with personal experience, and come up with some conclusions.

Doesn't mean I'm right, but it also doesn't mean I'm not allowed to discuss the results of people who study this stuff.

Now, if you have any books you've read or studies you've seen which have a contradictory position, I'd love to hear about it. Or do you just not like the conclusion so you get angry?
jerikson40
12 years ago
And by the way, Jester, I'm not saying that the young folks are the only ones who waste their time online. We all do it. We're doing it right now. This is nothing more than entertainment, and all of us giving our opinions that nobody else really cares about. It's not about rationally discussing issues and forming opinions, it's about spouting off what you believe. And those who agree with you feel better about themselves, and those who disagree get all pissed off and think you're an asshole. Doesn't matter what generation you're in, we all use this for entertainment and for goofing off.
Clubber
12 years ago
I got it!!!

Write a book/conduct a study, then you become an expert!

jerikson40
12 years ago
"Write a book/conduct a study, then you become an expert!"

Not necessarily, but at least if gives you more information to base a decision on than some moron who has opinions based on nothing but emotion.
txtittyfan
12 years ago
I have rread Jester's comments a couple of times, but fail to see his comment that he disageed with the author. And it seems like Jerikson is still so wrapped up in his beliefs that he can not see the point others are making without launching an attack.

And now we wait for the useless comment from our resident asshole Dougster.
Dougster
12 years ago
Tittyfan seems pretty pissed off today. I wonder if it is because he was a) 2x short treasuries today, b) denied extras ITC and OTC by the women at BSC (just as he admits he has been for the last 30 years), or maybe it's c) all of the above!
txtittyfan
12 years ago
Soooo predictable Douggie, I knew you wouldn't let us down.
Dougster
12 years ago
Yep, "predictable" to you (after the fact). Your forward predictions of events like direction of the treasury market have been complete, unmitigated disasters, OTOH. So stick to your predictions of things that happened on the past.
gatorfan
12 years ago
I failed psychology I have nothing to add
jester214
12 years ago
My point, which you clearly missed, was that you say twice that you're trying not to rag on anyone while presenting a "study" that is pretty insulting and that you apparently concur with.

Your suggestion that I'm "angry" is inaccurate and a weak attempt to dismiss what I said.
Clubber
12 years ago
Sarcasm often blows right over someones head instead of hitting them right in the face. That said...

YAWN!
motorhead
12 years ago
"I failed psychology I have nothing to add"

You could have passed it at Florida State if you played football.
Dougster
12 years ago
The jestie-girl spake thus: "Your suggestion that I'm 'angry' is inaccurate"

When is the jestie-girl ever not angry? Anger is the whole essence of his being.
jerikson40
12 years ago
Jester sez: "you say twice that you're trying not to rag on anyone while presenting a "study" that is pretty insulting and that you apparently concur with"

I'm sorry if you thought the study was insulting, but like I say, I didn't write it. I just presented it to you guys. Is that ragging on someone? No, ragging on someone is giving someone shit just because you don't like them, without any supporting information. The kind of stuff people on this forum do on a regular basis. I, on the other hand, gave a reference to people who did a lot of work and surveyed many people over decades.

If someone does a lot of studying of something, should I ignore it and agree with someone who presents NO information or studies to back up their position?

I also gave some opinions based on my own experience. I'm sorry if you disagree with my opinions, but there's not much I can do about that. However, I am more than willing to change my opinion if you or others can provide me some reasonable information that leads to a different conclusion. Why not try that instead of attacking?
gatorfan
12 years ago
But if I went to Florida State I would have had psychology issues.

Gators are #2 and soon to be #1 team in the BCS!
jester214
12 years ago
"then Millenials are the "You mean there are other people??" Generation. People spend hours and hours alone at their computers or with their noses buried in their cellphones, not interacting with people in person."

"It's not about getting personal and connected with real friends, nor is it about using the internet for learning and other honorable endeavors. It's about goofing around with people you've never met so you don't have to get off your butt and deal with real people in real life."

“These da­ta show that re­cent genera­t­ions are less likely to em­brace com­mun­ity mind­ed­ness and are fo­cus­ing more on mon­ey, im­age and fame.”

I don't see how you could call any of those three quotes anything but insulting. You wrote two of those. The third you did not, but you do seem to agree with it.

What you said amounts to this: "A lot of people sure do think those people from Nebraska are boring. Personally I think all they ever do is talk about Corn and Football, it's pretty worthless. Here's a study that says most people from Nebraska are considered boring. Now I'm not trying to insult anybody from Nebraska but I just thought this might let everybody know why most people from Nebraska suck ass."



Unrelated: I'm curious though, did you look at any other research. Perhaps professional reviews/criticisms of a book that was clearly written for profit? A quick google searched showed several academic pieces that question both her findings and her methods.
looneylarry
12 years ago
I don't know about the studies or the measurements or the debate raging above. I do know that this generation is far more "connected" than any previously. I laugh when some of these threads involve pointers in how to stay a couple steps ahead of dancers--buy burn phones, Google voice, fake FB accounts, how to handle texts--when we are old codgers and these girls could show us a few things on gadgets.

But the point is (from my experience) that these young dancers claim to be so connected and have so many "friends" and are in constant contact with unlimited texts and all, but this generation is losing its ability to converse and interact in person. The art of conversation is drying up, where people actually look at each other in the eyes, listen to each other, and respond honestly without just scoring points or waiting for the other person to take a breath so that they can jump in.

I am not trying to denigrate an entire generation. I am just calling it like I see it. For a generation that is proud of its connectedness and multi-tasking, it is starving for real human interaction.
jerikson40
12 years ago
Larry sez: "But the point is (from my experience) that these young dancers claim to be so connected and have so many "friends" and are in constant contact with unlimited texts and all, but this generation is losing its ability to converse and interact in person. The art of conversation is drying up, where people actually look at each other in the eyes, listen to each other, and respond honestly without just scoring points or waiting for the other person to take a breath so that they can jump in"

My point exactly.

And jester, what I said may be offensive. In fact, I'm sure it is to some people. But I don't care. To the extent it's true, whether or not some find it offensive is irrelevant. Because, especially in the Millenial generation, people go out of their way to find ways to be offended. They don't care about issues and facts, they care about how it was said. Offending someone has become the #1 most shocking crime in the US. People have become absolutely incapable of accepting criticism, dealing with it like an adult, and maybe even agreeing with it if it's true.

You see that here all the time. Most people here are absolutely INCAPABLE of accepting anything that proves them wrong, or even any contrary opinions that don't agree with them, without freaking out and getting upset and offended and calling people names.

It's childish.

Now, I'm sure I've offended even more people by what I just said. But I don't care. Deal with it like an adult.
jester214
12 years ago
"Most people here are absolutely INCAPABLE of accepting anything that proves them wrong"

That pretty much sums up your entire response.
jerikson40
12 years ago
"That pretty much sums up your entire response"

As usual, you're great at knocking people down with cute and meaningless one liners, but why not provide a reasoned response? Or don't you have one?
jerikson40
12 years ago
By the way, jester, with all due respect your whole point seems to be:

"I think you're rude, and I don't like your opinion, and even though you presented a study that references other studies and agrees with your opinion, I don't like your opinion. However, I don't have anything that supports my disagreement, and all I can provide is some talk about a google search that shows there are some people out there who disagree with the study you referenced. But it's up to you to do more research to prove that you're wrong. Okay?"
jester214
12 years ago
You missed my whole point then, but I'm not surprised. I pointed out your the problem quite simply and reasonably and your response was "your childish". You can't have a reasonable discussion with people who cherry pick what they respond to and at the same time twist what is said.

You started out saying you weren't trying to insult anyone, while insulting them. <--- My original point.

Now it's "I don't care if I'm being offensive, I'm proud of it". <--- What you really meant from the start.

Since you can't address my actual point you've twisted it. Also you never did answer my question. A related question: Have you actually read this book, or did you just read something about the book?
jester214
12 years ago
(Don't know why this part got cut off)

You started out saying you weren't trying to insult anyone, while insulting them. <--- My original point

Now you don't care if you offend anyone and appear to be proud of it. <--- What you meant from the beginning.

Since you can't address my actual point, you've twisted my comments so you can respond. You also failed to answer my question, so here's another. Have you actually read this book or did you just read an article about the book?
jester214
12 years ago
Okay this is weird... It keeps cutting off parts of my posts. I'll try again later.
jerikson40
12 years ago
"You started out saying you weren't trying to insult anyone, while insulting them"

Okay, if it would make you feel better, I can erase what I said and re-say it:

"It's fully my intent to rag on young folks with this post..."

Now, how does that change any of the issues I discussed? It doesn't. Either what I said, and what was said in the article, is reasonable or it isn't. If you don't agree with it, then fine. Either make a better case or state your opinion and move on. Okay?
Book Guy
12 years ago
Well, aside from the flame-ware, I'd have to say the thread is kinda on topic. I've felt like technology doesn't necessarily "bring people together," although it CAN if used intelligently. And I've felt that the recent "millennial" and such generations are vapidly self-involved in that way that only technology can excuse -- for example, by preferring online news to their RSS feeds (a technology which, of itself, I do not condemn; but which can be USED for intelligent or idiotic purposes). The reason they like the RSS instead of the printed newspaper? "I don't have to read all the politics and foreign disaster crap if I don't want to. I get to read only what I WANT to read, and nothing else."

It's like they're crack babies. They want what they want, and what's wrong with that? Why should they have to suffer through something they DON'T want?

Well, kiddies, when you only get what you want, sometimes you don't get what you need. :P
motorhead
12 years ago
@gatorfan

The Gators really took a big bite out of the ole ball coach today. Go Gators!
jester214
12 years ago
It changes the entire tone of the post. What we have isn't a "psychological discussion" but an opinionated rant backed up with a "study" which you seemingly haven't even read.

If I posted a study, or even several studies, that refuted or disagreed with this book it wouldn't matter because it was never about science or psychology. It was a potshot.
gatorfan
12 years ago
Yes they did and I'm finally sober enough to type
minnow
12 years ago
The comments/laments made by todays elders about younger generation being internet addicted sound similar to those made by elders when I was "young" about television. Regardless of communication, or entertainment media, the challenge is to make technology work for oneself, rather than become a slave to technology.

On the subject of younger generations being more concerned about money: I initially thought that recent severe recession could be a contributing factor, but further examination reveals that all 3 generational survey periods experienced at least one deep recession, and at least 1 or 2 other recessions. Other studies show that income/wealth distribution has become more lopsided since 1966 (earliest year in survey), and particularly more so since ~ early 80's onward. So, lack of money (real or perceived) could be a driver here.
farmerart
12 years ago
Characterizing one generation or another as the 'Me' generation is simply a lazy exercise in shoddy rhetoric. One of the primal urges of humans is self-preservation.

We are all 'Me' generations whatever may be the year of our births.
You must be a member to leave a comment.Join Now
Got something to say?
Start your own discussion