My first thought was a flip, "Damn, I am jealous of that lucky little kid!"
However, after reading the story, this is am more complicated situation. The cheerleader is another female teacher winding up facing criminal charges for having sex with a student.
Our society allows females less than 18 years old to have abortions without parental consent, ostensibly because of privacy and control over one's body. But in contrast, because teachers are in a position of authority, when a teacher becomes involved in a relationship with a student, that student is presumed to be unable to consent. Those two positions are somewhat inconsistent.
The kicker to this story is that the former student has graduated and is now 18. He left the courtroom with the former teacher and cheerleader after she pled guilty to reduced criminal charges. So how efffective were the criminal charges? Oh well, another notch in the prosecutor's belt.
Had it been a male teacher and female student, they would have been throwing the book at the teacher. This bitch doesn't even have to register as a sex offender. Our court system is designed to treat men and women offenders unequally.
To avoid possible LEGAL consequences all parties involved in the sex should wait until both parties are of legal age. Otherwise it is a HUGE risk legally.
She's amazingly beautiful, that is one lucky 17 year old!
And yes, she's a teacher and she was in a position of power over him when she started flirting with him. He was in a situation where if he would have wanted to say no it would have been very difficult for him. She should have been required to register as a sex offender, the same as a male teacher.
Well if you read the article a big part of why she is getting off easy is the "victim" and his family don't appear to want her prosecuted.
I personally think there's a difference between a male teacher sleeping with female students and a female teacher sleeping with male students. It's wrong in either case, but there are some different psychological factors in play.
The simplest fact is a teacher should not sleep with a student, regardless of age or sex.
"Life & the consequences of any action you take is NOT REQUIRED to be fair to you or anyone else."
Not a good plan to go by if one wants the law to be taken seriously. Already in many black communities, the sense of being exploited or whatever, causes them to deny information to the police to properly arrest trouble makers. (Of course, then the next cry is why aren't the police doing anything?)
There have been issues in Phoenix with male teachers/female students and female coaches having sex with girls on their teams. All adults were treated harshly in the penalties. The female coaches were no more than 5-7 years older than the students.
Being serious about obeying the Law is, of course, an individual decision. Life and consequences happen, fair or not. Wanting good things to occur doesn't necessarily make it SO!!
The justice system is really fucked up. Equal rights my ass.This is why women deserve no rights. Getting away with stuff like that. But on the flip side, go kid for fucking a teacher when he was 14 years old WOO!
On the thought sometimes posted in these threads, perhaps schools should have a look qualification. Sixty years old, fat, chalk under her fingers, ugly clothes for school teachers.
26 comments
Latest
However, after reading the story, this is am more complicated situation. The cheerleader is another female teacher winding up facing criminal charges for having sex with a student.
Our society allows females less than 18 years old to have abortions without parental consent, ostensibly because of privacy and control over one's body. But in contrast, because teachers are in a position of authority, when a teacher becomes involved in a relationship with a student, that student is presumed to be unable to consent. Those two positions are somewhat inconsistent.
The kicker to this story is that the former student has graduated and is now 18. He left the courtroom with the former teacher and cheerleader after she pled guilty to reduced criminal charges. So how efffective were the criminal charges? Oh well, another notch in the prosecutor's belt.
And yes, she's a teacher and she was in a position of power over him when she started flirting with him. He was in a situation where if he would have wanted to say no it would have been very difficult for him. She should have been required to register as a sex offender, the same as a male teacher.
I personally think there's a difference between a male teacher sleeping with female students and a female teacher sleeping with male students. It's wrong in either case, but there are some different psychological factors in play.
The simplest fact is a teacher should not sleep with a student, regardless of age or sex.
Not a good plan to go by if one wants the law to be taken seriously. Already in many black communities, the sense of being exploited or whatever, causes them to deny information to the police to properly arrest trouble makers. (Of course, then the next cry is why aren't the police doing anything?)
She was probably paid for the services rendered.
Hell, yeah, I'm jealous.
This is a state where cousins marry at 13. Of course she didn't think she was doing anything wriong.
She looked hotter in her cheerleader outfit.
The gray sweater is not flattering.