I've been thinking about this for past couple of weeks. Then StallOut's thread brought it more to forefront.
When you haven't had direct experience with a dancer but have observed behavior you think others should be warned about Do you write in in a review.
Here is situation. In a club I regularly attend have observed one dancer 3 times do things that guys should be warned about but I've never interacted with dancers just over heard or have seen while in a VIP session with a favorite dancer. What happened
- The dance trapped a guy against wall asking him for a tip physically blocking him from leaving VIP couch area.
- The dancer I was with heard her ask for a $1000 tip. I heard the tip request but not the amount. This was in a $300 per hour VIP area and not sure but they may only have been there for the $160 half hour time. I do know the managers were dealing with a declined credit card. And knowing the club approach to CC that would have been a 2nd session.
- Last week saw her Ask a customer for tip guy started to leave and got 6 ft away then returned to hear him look for his wallet. Don't know for sure but felt as if she was hiding the wallet. And think we heard him say you slapped me.
In summary, this dancer is very aggressive in seeking tips and have observed physical intimidation of guys. But I personally have not had a dance with her.
Should I write a review and name her? This club I regularly visit and only review when club makes changes. No changes so no other reason for a review.
What does this board think I should do?


I would personally prefer that negative reviews of true rip-off girls would name names, and in fact give descriptions so that the dancer can't just change her name in order to continue to get away with a true rip-off.
But what you're reporting is not necessarily a true rip-off. You are reporting a high level of "excess hustle" but you are not reporting a true bait-and-switch, nor are you reporting a demand for excess payment that was extorted inappropriately.
So, she's not an extortionist: She didn't GET the extra money she demanded or, if she did, she only got it through VOLUNTARY action of the men. They either gave it or didn't, and disliked their interaction with her or didn't.
And, she's not a bait-and-switch liar: She didn't pro-actively claim she would perform one level of service, a level which would be reasonably understood to be a valid promise at the club in question (given the club's general spoken and unspoken "rules") but then fail to provide that level even though she received agreed-upon money for it. I don't see any descriptions of false advertising, or a detriment to a customer due to the fact that he paid for something and relied on her false word about it.
So, she's not actually the sort of person who needs to be named. In my PERSONAL opinion.
Others will have significantly differing opinions, I think. The idea of naming any dancer by name, whether positively or negatively, is one of the most difficult on this (or any other adult-services-related) board. Many people say "No, almost never." Many other people say "Yes, almost always." Consequently, I strongly urge you to get many more opinions, and in fact to get "official" opinions from the website operators and owners, before deciding on any choice in the matter as your own.