Just pokin' 'roun' the internet, I found myself in a (quite old!) picture of a stage performance at the House of Lancaster I in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. [I think. You can see it online in this manner: 1. go to thehouseoflancaster.com. Click the bottom tab labeled "virtual tour." A new window pops up, and the first image is of a dancer performing some kind of stage show with fire batons. Just off her right tit is a bald guy -- my buddy P the psychologist -- in the audience looking hard to his left. I am the bearded dude in a crew-neck sweatshirt over a t-shirt right next to P. It's hardly recognizable, and even less so as the background image to the first web page you just looked at, but hey! I explicitly remember that evening, visiiting with my sports team including P, seeing the fire batons of the damn feature dancer.]
Got me wondering. Shouldn't there be issues about photographing the audience? Wouldn't you have thought they would have let us know that they were photographing? WTF!?
Anyone else want to have his mug flashed all over the 'net while he gawps at neekid girlies?


Yeah, if they're taking pictures of us urinating, then I'd like to know, too. But then, those wouldn't be pictures I'd ever happen to run across in my other usual peregrinations throughout the internet. Maybe we're all on the 'net in compromising poses, but they're posted on porn sites we aren't interested in! "Men Urinating Dot Com" isn't high on my saved Google searches list ...