Just pokin' 'roun' the internet, I found myself in a (quite old!) picture of a stage performance at the House of Lancaster I in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. [I think. You can see it online in this manner: 1. go to
http://www.thehouseoflancaster…. Click the bottom tab labeled "virtual tour." A new window pops up, and the first image is of a dancer performing some kind of stage show with fire batons. Just off her right tit is a bald guy -- my buddy P the psychologist -- in the audience looking hard to his left. I am the bearded dude in a crew-neck sweatshirt over a t-shirt right next to P. It's hardly recognizable, and even less so as the background image to the first web page you just looked at, but hey! I explicitly remember that evening, visiiting with my sports team including P, seeing the fire batons of the damn feature dancer.]
Got me wondering. Shouldn't there be issues about photographing the audience? Wouldn't you have thought they would have let us know that they were photographing? WTF!?
Anyone else want to have his mug flashed all over the 'net while he gawps at neekid girlies?
Comments
last commentAs far as possible filming goes, one thing many years ago I thought was really suspicious was a wire going down to one of the men's urinal. I was thinking why is there a wire going down there? It made me wonder. I don't know if that would be legal or not. If it is legal, it's certainly not ethical.
I went to visit one popular club at the beach and it was very crowded. The dancers were doing special performances and it looked like they were being filmed. I didn't know what that was about. One dancer offered to find me a chair and took it to the stage and sat in my lap. A few months later I ran into a dancer who says she still works there and that I'm on their DVD. I don't know if she recognized me from the DVD or visa versa. I'm thinking either she has good eyes or perhaps they zoomed in on me when filming a dancer. I went to that club one time.