tuscl

New Mexico State Police Officer Fired After Caught Having Sex on Car

SANTE FE, N.M. – A New Mexico state police officer has been fired after security cameras caught him having sex with a woman on the hood of a car.

Officer Bert Lopez's dismissal from the New Mexico state police was confirmed by The Santa Fe New Mexican on Saturday. The newspaper said Lopez has 30 days to appeal the firing.
The surveillance photos were taken from a motion-triggered security camera positioned at the front gate of the county-owned La Bajada Ranch south of Santa Fe. The encounter was at the remote Canyon Ranch.

Two photos showing a uniformed officer having sex on the hood were forwarded to Santa Fe Sheriff Robert Garcia, who identified the officer as being with New Mexico State Police. He forwarded the images to State Police Chief Robert Shilling.

An internal investigation was immediately launched, and Lopez, an eight-year veteran, was put on paid administrative leave for about three weeks.

Police officials would not comment on whether the dismissal was an indication whether the officer was on duty at the time of the incident.

The dismissal came days after investigators said the officer didn't commit a crime. Officials were assured the sexual encounter was not in exchange for anything related to his position as a law enforcement officer.

"It is an embarrassing situation for the department, but we have to remember the rights of the employee afford him due process we must follow so we won't be commenting further," said spokesman Sgt. Tim Johnson.

The department refused to release the identity of the woman or details about her relationship with the officer. It was unclear when the photos were taken, but Garcia said he believed it was either late July or early August.

If Lopez contests his firing, the appeal goes to a special commission within the New Mexico state police department and then state District Court, according to the New Mexican.
Lopez was named a 2009 state police office of the year and was awarded a "Challenge Coin" in July, an honor given to officers who have gone above and beyond the call of duty.


Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/us/2011/09/03/new…

18 comments

  • shadowcat
    13 years ago
    Here is the link to the photos that I posted when they first came out. Be sure to enlarge the photos. LOL.

    http://www.thesmokinggun.com/buster/publ…
  • steve229
    13 years ago
    "an honor given to officers who have gone above and beyond the call of duty."

    It appears he's been doing that regularly.
  • vincemichaels
    13 years ago
    Awww, shucks.
  • georgmicrodong
    13 years ago
    Is there a rule against having sex while in uniform? Or is he fired just because he embarrassed the police department by getting caught? If he in fact did nothing illegal (and the facts so far in evidence don't confirm or deny that, though sex in public is a crime in most places I know of), and there's no specific or general rule in the police employment manual about such a thing, then they were wrong to fire him.
  • shadowcat
    13 years ago
    george - I would be willing to bet that he violated a "Code of Contuct".
  • Dudester
    13 years ago
    GMD-When you're a cop, in uniform, you are required to behave in a manner above the societal norm. Off duty, you may drink, but only if you're out of uniform. That's why it's so insulting to me, to see cops in uniform, in a Hollywood movie (Superbad) throwing back some brewskis at a bar.

    Wearing a uniform, you are highly visible, and much is expected of you. Even off duty, on the way home, you can find yourself, working an accident, stopping a crime in progress, or backing up a public agency in a unseen situation. Policve cars and Officers don't have an off duty sign (like a cab or city bus), so the public perception is that you are representing the community unless the car is parked and the uniform is off-and even then, don't wave your badge somewhere expecting carte blanche because it may backfire on you.
  • georgmicrodong
    13 years ago
    @'cat: No doubt, but is that grounds for dismissal? If it's a first offense, possibly not. Note that I'm not saying it is or it isn't, but the guy deserves his day in front of an arbitration board.
  • Dudester
    13 years ago
    If Lopez contests his firing, the appeal goes to a special commission within the New Mexico state police department and then state District Court, according to the New Mexican.
  • sharkhunter
    13 years ago
    What I'm wondering is why the little critter walked right up to them to get a better look. That's in case you didn't notice the little weasel near the guy's foot or whatever it is called. Lol.
  • georgmicrodong
    13 years ago
    Dudester, I'm just getting sick and tired of the notion that having sex is something that merits punishment. It just feeds the puritanical bastards who are fucking this country up.

    So he had sex? Was she unwilling, or bribing him? If so, prosecute him for that. Otherwise, shut the fuck up and leave him alone. At *worst* this is a slight lapse in judgement that warrants a "hey, get a room next time" warning. Especially if he's never done anything like it before.
  • Dudester
    13 years ago
    I'm as opposed to the puriticanical crap as you are, but suppose you get pulled over one night, and the cop reeks of alcohol. Suppose you are doing OTC at a hotel and a cop car pulls up. Two girls and a cop get out. He puts one under each arm and goes in the room. As you replay that in your mind, you realize that one of those girls is a weeeeee bit young, but that's not the best part. The next morning, on the news, you read about a shootout in which an acquaintance of yours is killed. The shootout happened just a mile from the hotel, and about fifteen minutes after you saw the cop.


    Wait, it gets better, and this isn't a hypothetical. Your house is on fire and you find out that the fire department response was delayed because the firefighters on duty had some female action going on, and they had to "disengage" to respond to the fire (happened once in the 1970's and again in the 80's).

    There is a time and place for everything. I don't want the government in my bedroom or minding my business, but if a govt. employee is on duty, or is under color of uniform, they need to rein it in until they are off duty and out of sight. I don't know your vocation, but suppose you walk in your place of business and the security guard on duty is banging some chick ? You would not believe the number of security personnel fired for doing just that. Yeah, it happens, and sometimes it's on video.

    You're the CEO or branch manager and the guard that your company is being billed 25.00 per hour (although the guard makes 10.00) is spending his on duty time being inattentive because he's getting laid.

    What about, you work in the high rise and you catch your boss banging the new receptionist in the conference room (tell me that doesn't happen), or the hotel you stay at screws up your bill, but when you came past the desk, the night auditor might've been a little busy (cutie hanging out at or near the desk).

    Like I said, time and place for everything.
  • georgmicrodong
    13 years ago
    No offense, Dudester, but bullshit. It is complete and utter bullshit to equate drinking, pedophilia and other distractions *on* duty with consensual sex *off* duty. As I said before, if he was, in fact, on duty (and the article doesn't say), then yes, he should be disciplined, possibly even fired for his action. If not, it's no worse than trading baseball cards while in uniform and off duty.

    It's the puritanical thing I mentioned before. The fact that you think it "tarnishes" the uniform indicates that even *you* think there's something wrong with sex, without even questioning it?

    Sex off duty, whether in uniform or not, is no more immoral or improper than the baseball card example, and trading baseball cards on duty is *just* as inappropriate as sex on duty. It's a distraction on a job that requires attention.

  • shadowcat
    13 years ago
    The real question here is what was the Chihuahua thinking?
  • Alucard
    13 years ago
    "The real question here is what was the Chihuahua thinking?"

    Am I next?

    Where is my partner?

    LMAO
  • deogol
    13 years ago
    He should have gotten some time off to cool his heels. Technically there wasn't anyone around either other than that camera. Before they put cameras on everything, it would have simply been a fun rollick.
  • sharkhunter
    13 years ago
    I thought long and hard about this serious issue. I believe the Chihuahua was thinking, "oh boy, that looks like fun!"
  • sharkhunter
    13 years ago
    As far as the less serious issue, the cop may have been on duty but why can't someone take a 10 or 15 minute break sometime? It's not like he was taking too many breaks during his shift was he? Of course I can imagine if some family drove by and saw the officer enforcing his right to fuck in public and they were doing 90 and crashed as a result of the father swerving to avoid a chihuahua getting naughty in the middle of the road, there might be some blame to go around. I mean teaching chihuahuas that it's ok to do that out on the road could cause accidents.
  • rh48hr
    13 years ago
    I think there have been a lot of salient points made here. But I think just as much as we all might want to call BS on this if he was off duty, many jobs would react in the same way if you are doing something illegal or in some minds "immoral" wearing an article of clothing with their company name or logo on it. But I'm with you GMD.

    Many people here on this site can't tell people at their work about their SC hobby because of how it is perceived. While that may be wrong, it is how our society is at this point.

    The main fault I have with this guy is he didn't find somewhere more discreet. If there was a camera in the area, it had to be a relatively high traffic area. He's got to be smarter than that.

You must be a member to leave a comment.Join Now
Got something to say?
Start your own discussion