Wow, the editors must *really* be busy if this got through

sooperflysnooka has been a TUSCL member since 2004 and has 90+ reviews. I think Founder will let it slide since it is informational and useful information he posted.

As a review? An article maybe, or as a discussion post like you did, but as a review.

OK.

gmd, I know that review section is for reviews and that you might have different perception about it than some of us. I'm glad that you mentioned about this.

However, I think it will also help as a review, because it's such a useful information to have. But at the same time sooperflysnooka SHOULD HAVE posted only the news link, instead of putting the whole article in the review.

robbing1 -- There's a minimum text length required for reviews, so he probably included the article in order to get the system to accept it.

Just a question, but how long does the "review" process take before being accepted or not accepted for publication? I thought I wrote a pretty decent review on a Michigan club last night from a visit a couple of weeks ago, but it hasn't been published yet and I can't seem to find the progress on it anywhere. Thanks in advance.

scfan123, it generally takes about 1/2 day for it to be posted by Founder. If it hasn't shown up by tomorrow, message Founder to see if he got it.

Nice, it's published. That was pretty quick!

Well, the review is still up, so Founder must see some value in it. I suppose I can see the point; not everyone reads the discussion forums, so it could be considered a "review" in the sense that it warns people about what's up.

Another that I would consider a good article but not a review at all: