Comments by future POTUS and Senator in training (page 19)

just to make snarky observations Umm no I had my own thoughts about the ghetto before j went. Llike I said..I wanted to see prostitutes and gangsters not to bring light to these thoughts bit just to see them up close OBJECTIVELY. K. @DC water do u think

K so we both agree lying is more important cuz we both know sugaring is smthng I don't wanna do LOL

I bet it's icey

This is funny

Which is more important ..not lying or not being cut off and living on street ?

Smh..fat ppl aren't ur food..should mind ur own business to point where they don't matter...

Say opposing counsel represents a slumlord. The case is in San Francisco. The slumlord has been tried for slumlord shit in Chicago, fined by the city, etc. A judge can easily find all of that irrelevant to the case at hand in San Francisco ...that's why im not talking about slumlords In cases? If u wanna be irrelevant then just dont talk lol

And I'm not familiar with Austin Austin is an example..same.pattern applies to other cities

The areas are easier targets coz of less policing, lack of security cameras, poor lighting, neglected streets, proximity to abandoned areas etc. Oh yah. That's why it isnt just the areas...but Ut also that the perpetrators of these very crimes are of low income right ? Lmao Links don't matter No,but statistics that show the difference in crime rates are.

Poverty itself doesn't correlate with crime Sure it doesn't. I'm sure that is a logical statement to make when things like cars and apwrtments being broken into or stolen from occur at much higher rates than non impoverished areas, right ? For instances , the lower income ciities in Austin where median income is 30 K have crime rates that are higher than the city's average, nd 97 % higher than national average.I can even paste the link.

I don't know about apartment burglaries Yeah, we they people who have experienced living in such areas would know about them. And if you haven't experienced it, consider yourself lucky:)

"again cars being broken into is most common in night life and tourist corridors." I never denied that. Donald trump being wealthy doesn't change the fact that someone earing 250 k is still rich. By the same obvious logic, the fact that they occur the most in tourist areas doenst change the fact they occur at statistically significant high rate in lower income areas compared to higher income areas.

again cars being broken into is most common in night life and tourist corridors. I never denied that. Donald trump being wealthy doesn't change the fact that someone earing 250 k is still rich. By the same obvious logic, the fact that they occur the most in tourist areas doenst change the fact they occur at statistically significant high rate in lower income areas compared to higher income areas

P.s- thw fact that im hotter than a waiting pillow doesn't change the fact that apartments and cars get broken into one the daily in lower income areas, but although they occur in higher income income areas, they are relatively rarer occurrences there

As well as apartments being broken into much more frequently than lower income areas.

Property crime is a vague conceptits not a vague concept. While there are debates about should and should not be property crime , it doesnt change the fact that there are finite, specific number of offenses that fall under property crime. to clarify that I was not talking about a vague concept but rather a specific criminal offense , I'll remind you that by" property crime " I was referring to cars being broken into on the daily.

For example, its why ethnic or class based enclaves exist K. Still doesn't change the fact that property crime and cat calling occur significantly more in low.income.areas, which says a lot about the culture damaging other's property doesn't make it vandalism..uhh, I never said it did.?

but certain behaviors are a product of social, economic and political alienation. Yeah...cuz cat calling and damaging other.poor peoole's property and causing them to have to find the $$ that they dont have to compensate for recklessness is anyone but the perpetator's fault. What do you mean. By: A) social isolation ..and B) how do you find that to be a PROXIMAL CAUSE of the behaviors mentioned. Not really Oh really...we are going to ignore the very obvious and commonly known fact that the poorer that one area is, that generally correlated to more crimes occurring ?

So idk it might go both ways**

wouldn't vilify the majority of the people, who just want to do the best they can given with what they have. I'm not vilifying them..but their culture which allows a significantly higher number of.people to drink/do drugs on the regular and cat call women Like I said many of them are hardworking and don't do that but if you want to look at a culture , loom.at its norms. But at the same we as a society might be responsible for perpetuating that culture as well by making it harder to move up but idk.

Also, criminals will flock to where they can get away with crime, which usually equates to poor neighborhoods.. They don't need to flock anywhere when they already live in the same neighborhoods which crimes are committed lol

Icey. Inhernet in the definition of culture is "norms" look.it up. You determine culture by looking at the expectation, norms ..(I.g. EVERY DAY BEHAVIOR). While guys in a wealthy financial district might whisper something sexy in a girls ear, the DISTINGUISHING FACTOR is that such a whisper is not THE NORM. IT IS NOT A Daily, REGULAR THING...it is rare . But it is a NORM OR REGULAR THING to have things said to u like that on street. K

Cat calling= doing something disrespectful= honking at u, gawking at u, suggesting u should get in car of stranger Looking at( but not gawking or staring ).cuz u look pretty /saying.hi when you are close to.them.without them.randomly approaching u from.FAR AWAY= not Cat calling , but maybe flirt...flirting isn't. Getting hit on or being cat called No one says "Damn girl" from far away In the mall lmao Hitting on= goes on in street as an actual NORM.

so people have a vested interest in protecting their property. ... Everyone wants to.protect their property...shirty even in my neighborhood no one is rich enough to.have security cameras or proper protection but u don't see theft as the regular lmao.

so people have a vested interest in protecting their property. ... What does that have to do with the fact that thr demogrpahics of people who ruin others people property = low income