Very funny! If this was back in the days of b&w photography - it must have been a big deal to see a stripper doing this in the courtroom. If it was recent - then it would only be a big deal if she did what goldmongerATL mentioned above.
Comments
last commentWell...how could anyone think she was guilty of exposing her vag
Log in to vote
I think she’s hiding some cheesesticks in there
Log in to vote
She would have been acquitted until she shot out 3 ping pong balls and the judge's wristwatch.
Log in to vote
Very funny!
If this was back in the days of b&w photography - it must have been a big deal to see a stripper doing this in the courtroom.
If it was recent - then it would only be a big deal if she did what goldmongerATL mentioned above.
Log in to vote
1983 per the caption on the right. Probably a news photographer. They shot B&W back then.
Log in to vote
If the panties fit, you must acquit.
Log in to vote
Ha..The judge is spankin it under his desk!
Log in to vote
It worked. He acquitted them! And he ended up in Playboy. The photog got recognition, too.
vintag.es
Log in to vote
I wonder if the undercover cops had to pay back the $37,000 they spent gathering evidence?
Log in to vote