Geez, it was so clear to me last week. Women who have sex for money are hookers. But then steve229 cleared it up. He gets alot of requests to meet up for lunch from "civies". Now it turns out that his defintion of "civie" is somewhat misleading, er, "atypical" since "civie" apparently includes "sugar babies" who have sex for money. Asking around on TUSCL it seems that all agreed that these sugar babies are, indeed, "hookers". But I guess that is wrong because - stevie-girl said so! And because of the Winter War.
Now it seems that a few here have experience with "hookers", er, "sugar babies", er, "civies" but not as many as have experience with strippers.
So what's the situation with strippers? Are they also "civies"? Does it depend on whether they have sex for money or not? Or they just "civies" plain and simple?
Thoughts on the matter? Stevie-girl?