IDIOTS Judging reviews.

I just submitted two reviews and had both of the rejected by the same 4 people. One was a little short but it hit all the criteria except for describing in detail the layout which has been done so many times.

The other was long and hit all the necessary details, but yet the same 4 claim not enough details. I have

written over a 110 reviews and never had a problem.

The problem now is these assclowns just click on the reviews submitted to gain free VIP time and pay no attention to whether it meets the requirements or basic guidelines. All they are looking for is names of girls who play around. If a club has a 100 reviews or more, there is no need to rehash every detail of the layout.

Yeah, I am pissed off that I had to resubmit the reviews. But I am more pissed off that these 4 judges have no clue about what is necessary. And I am picking on these 4 because if affected me. I have seen reviews submitted and approved that are 3 or 4 sentences long, over a year old, and some so blatantly false that it is ridiculous.

Centerfolds review

This clown even told me I should have spent my time and money to have a beer. Yet I clearly described all necessary items and explained why I did not.

lurkingdog said: Not Enough Details

Not much about the club on this review. You should have at least had a beer

Emporors

This guy had the nerve to tell me the review was not long enough even though it met all details and was one of the longer ones i have written.. and that is over 110 of them

minnow said: too short

Wow... just found that this older article was never "published".. It was from pre Covid.. but still is accurate.

So I am submitting it anyway..