Comments by SirLapdancealot (page 20)

LMFAO Iceydodo and you clearly can't stop posting about him. It's like his ghost is living in your head, rent free. Like you're still being trolled by him with every post. And you like it. Lulz.

"My 5 year relationship ended because she thought I was too controlling... ...would buy her gifts. Dedigner bags. Shoes. Expensive makeup... ...But then came the lies. She started fucking other guys for coke. And she ended up with a broke ass bum wannabe pimp junkie." ^^^Iceydodo post 6/24/21 "Realistically. I think all a pl is entitled to is the time they pay for. It's companionship and with that she's not obligated to say the truth about anything." ^^^Iceydodo post 9/22/22 🤭🤡😂😂😂

Speaking of scale, when I read 'Chaos' for the first time, my mind blew when I got to the part about fractals and Mandelbrot. https://youtu.be/0jGaio87u3A

@Subra I get that too, but who's to say that us/life/humanity wouldn't have existed, albeit briefly, in a collapsing universe? And if the expanding universe is "true", who's to say it's not on a path to oblivion? My point is that our lives and humanity is so short, relatively speaking, that it could still exist in universes with slightly different "balances".

I haven't had a lapdance in months. Taking a break again.

"It's also crazy to think of how everything in the universe is able to exist and work because of meticulous little consistencies. If these were to change on a microscopic level, life would end as we know it." ^^^I see it as a scale and relative issue. The universe is simply macroscopic to us/humans/humanity. We are microscopic in scale so a star expanding, to us, seems like a very long time. But to the universe it's like the blink of an eye.

"If I put $0.9999... into a vending machine I won't be able to get the $1 item." ^^^In theory you'd have to do it for infinity and then you'd get the item.

My mind is still fucked when I think about how computer chips do what they do. At its core, a chip transistor is producing a 1 or 0 result. Or you can think of it as a yes or no answer. And through thousands and thousands of transistors basically answering in this yes/no fashion, we get the ability to post on TUSCL or watch a CGI movie. It's simple binary logic doing advanced analog things in real life. Never ceases to blow my mind.

"I'm EE PhD." @heaving I'm not surprised and have much respect for you. Getting to that level takes an excellent mathematician AND mastery of all the pure sciences. 👏👏👏👍👍

heaving you sound like an EE or physicist talking Fourier transforms and CMOS devices. Also a process engineer.

I went through high school thinking that taking the square root of a negative number was truly 'imaginary' and completely useless from a scientific standpoint. And then I get to college and it comes back to me in the math of quantum chemistry and wave functions. That was another math mindfuck to me. 🤯

@rattdog I appreciate the comments. At my school (UC Berkeley) my best subject was quantum chemistry. It was the only class where I got an A+. And yeah, the math is pretty hard. In short it's the combination of probability distributions, calculus, and, at times, imaginary numbers all jumbled together. And just to add to the thread topic I'll say that vector calculus and differential equations were the most difficult math topics that I've ever faced. The mindfuck to me was that it's calculus in three dimensions. Instead of just 'x' as the calculus variable, with vector calculus you have to also solve for'y' and 'z' at the same time you solve for 'x'. 🤯🤯🤯 "Uncertainty is how you take something which in classical mechanics would be deterministic, and turn it into probability." ^^^As stated @san_jose_creep, go back to school and really learn how to do and understand the math of what you are currently just regurgitating from reading books about it in the library. Uncertainty is related to a particle's probability wave function, but it is NOT the basis of it. Once again, your understanding of this is convoluted.

"And it does depend on the uncertainty principle" ^^^I never said it didn't. I just said that it had MORE to to with probability than uncertainty. And I understand the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle, deBroglie wavelengths, and everything alse you are rambling about well. I've actually had to do math problems and calculations based on it all. As stated, go back to school and really learn how to do and understand the math of what you are currently just regurgitating from reading books about it in the library.

^^^again you are convoluting things. And it's not worth unpacking for you. Go back to school and really learn how to do and understand the math of what you are currently just regurgitating from reading books about it in the library.

san_jose_creep your "understanding" of science and math is very convoluted and you often try to connect things that have very little relevance to each other. You clearly only understand from a cursory level, but not from the true and exact mathematical level. It's like you read books about all this technical stuff but you can't and don't actually perform the mathematical proofs or problems yourself. And then due to your ignorance you make false assumptions and connections that are unfounded. In other words, you only know enough about a topic to "be dangerous", and you don't truly understand it. For example your understanding and explanation of tunnelling is not quite correct. It has more to do with probability than uncertainty and the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle. Any small particle (like an electron) can simply exist anywhere in space, and there is a mathematical probability equation that defines this. This probability drops off significantly with the distance from a known point. And even the media in which it exists is also a variable. So as stated before, when you have transistors and conductors that approach (<-note that I said approach and not equal) the size of atoms, then there is a higher probability that the electrons in the transistor or conductor can "tunnel" to another location which is outside of where it is supposed to be. This is why it is problematic with today's chips - their literal dimensions are now so small that quantum physics is significant. When chips were literally bigger several years ago, the quantum physics mattered less.

The issue with quantum tunnelling is simply that the overall size of the transistor and conductors on a chip are approaching the size of atoms themselves, where quantum physics/chemistry matter. And their relative placement from one another are small dimensions too. Everything is literally getting smaller on a chip. As such, the quantum physics is coming more into play than the classical physics. A transistor on a chip is down to less than 10 nanometers in size. The conductor sizes are also on this order of magnitude in size. Copper or gold "wires" on a chip are literally only several atoms in diameter. Also everything is placed in close proximity to each other. Again, these are all size scales where quantum physics/chemistry matter more.

"are you trying to intertwine this thread with the satanic one?" Naw. Just giving a possible theory as to why san_jose_creep is, though.

.999 upside down is 666. Just sayin'.

"This thread is one of the dumbest here." ^^^ it's coz there are dumbasses that don't know math that post as if they do. Like the dumbass that posted .99999 = .9 🤭🤡😂😂😂

".99999 is the same as .9 in the real world. I'm nit talking abstract shit" ^^^ Ok, like you said, own 90% of your car instead of 99.999% of it. Same thing, right dumbass? 🤯🤭🤡😂😂😂

*contradiction*

"Okay then like I said. Own 99% of your car instead of 100%." ".99999 is the same as .9 in the real world. I'm nit talking abstract shit" ^^^Two statements by the same dumbass...in complete contradict with one another. 🤭🤡😂😂😂

LMFAO Iceydodo first says $1 > 99¢, then she says 0.9999 = .9. That's next level dumbass shit.

LMFAO she "maliciously" "trolled" herself. Iceydodo is a bit melodramatic about it. 🤭🤡😂 @nicespice maybe you should create a new thread, "Trolling TUSCL While Dissociative Identity Disordered", and then close it 400 posts with yourself later.

"Last night I came close to killing myself. My 5 year relationship ended because she thought I was too controlling... ...She called me controlling and obsessive... ...I couldn't handle it anymore so I planned on getting fucked up at the club she used to work at and then overdosing on heroin." ^^^Iceydodo post 6/24/21 "Remember they deal with the bottom of the barrel men and that affects their relationships etc" ^^^Iceydodo post 9/18/22 🤭🤡😂😂😂