see msnbc.msn.com
From a Today Show interview with a high end provider.
Now this isn't a legal defense, rather a defense of his actions that actually as some degree of truth to it, and of course we don't know if Spitzer was also having regular affairs
This comment I found the most interesting:
"A lot of the married guys, one of the things I used to believe at the time was that I was actually doing a service for these guys, because rather than having an affair with their secretary and potentially ruining their lives, they would come see me, satisfy their needs physically and some of the companionship they wanted — going on a date, having fun, relaxing — and being able to sustain their marriage. Apparently that's what some people need."


I do think the "high end provider" has a point. If a married guy "just gotta have strange pussy", buying it from a prostitute seems a lot less threatening to the marriage than entering into a sexual affair with secretary/social_friend/whatever. However, prostitution for some reason carries a worse stigma than the affair. Plus, it's illegal for most partakers. So, as usual, we have tradeoffs to consider.
But there is still a strange irony -- according to the customs and mores of our civilization, a marriage is supposed to be based on monogamy. So how do we rationalize "just gotta have strange pussy" ???