Wait for it: the “scandal” when it turns out the “creator” is just an AI bot programmed to suck money from simp suckers. Upside: real girls might have to return to stripping, an IRL experience that cannot be replaced by tech. Of course we’ll need re-education camps to get those trained by institutions of higher indoctrination, I mean education, to learn to tolerate such patriarchal exploitation of woman-identifying peoples for carnal pleasures….
Stripping is not patriarchal exploitation. Stripping is the female gender manipulating the male gender and exploiting his sex drive for her monetary gain. It is the ultimate female empowerment and we are here, on this website, because we all support this ultimate female empowerment.
Society as a whole is becoming more automated, online, and less personal. Why should a hot babe bother with physical contact with maybe 20-50 horny males that she wouldn't like IRL in a stripclub when she can just loll around in front of a cam and get $$ from a GLOBAL audience of simps with zero physical contact and no need to leave home ? OTOH, she's competing with a Global supply of other hot babes, and there is still a demand of some physical interaction. IMO, somehow a happy equilibrium will occur with all the competing agendas out there.
Camming I would guess has cut PL visits to strip clubs by 20 to 40 percent. But it hasn't provided the same or better income for 20 to 40 percent of strippers. I'd guess about 1% of strippers could attract an average of 20+ PLs when they're streaming. More, maybe 5 to 10 percent can do OK with one-on-one camming. But it's not a slam dunk that it's easier than lap dancing. Requests to jam various objects into various orifices are common (is what I've been told). The number of PLs per cammer, I think, is higher than PLs per stripper. So only a minority of strippers have the option of switching to camming and making the same or more $. For most, it just means emptier clubs and less $. Which means strippers switching to straight work.
Camming is more competitive, so the ability of white women to sell themselves as an upscale product to many men is a bigger advantage. So maybe camming is a big factor in the whole Clevon Little hey where the white women lament about strip clubs.
They are giving these girls money because in their minds they think its some kind of relationship. Thats how awful its become for large percentages of young men to find girlfriends or relationships. A 2019 study showed that around 30% of young men age 18 to 30 had not had sex in at least a year. These numbers have no doubt only increased in the past 4 years. Society either still doesn't realize this is happening, is completely indifferent and uncaring about their plight, or worse yet, but most likely, those in power want this to happen and think its great for ideological reasons. We can discuss why this is happening, but the reality is that it is and it doesn't seem like its going to reverse anytime soon.
That said, the idea of giving money to some girl online that they will never meet, never have any real life interaction much less physical intimacy with, is both bizarre and pathetic at the same time. While I understand the need for these vast percentages of young men to at least have the illusion of some sort of relationship with a woman I still have to fault them for doing this. When there is endless amounts of free nudity and porn readily avaliable online, there really is no excuse for giving money to these lazy money grubbing do-nothings taking advantage of young men's loneliness and hopelessness. The young men need to man up and stop doing this.
People can deride real life strip clubs, prostitution, etc, as fake and pretend, but at least in that moment the customer is actually interacting with another real life person in the real world. Giving money to some fake pseudo-whore online for literally nothing is not just a sad commentary on how society is failing the young heterosexual male but also pathetic and embarrassing on the part of young men. They need to stop giving these girls money when porn is already free and ubiquitous, or conversely get out in the real world and go to actual strip clubs or real life prostitutes. Stop enabling this crap.
No the real reason is because strip clubs increased pricing. Not all of these broads will make money like that. They are starting to see that now. It's like the OF and Tik Tok can go strong from a month to a year and it dies down quickly. There are very few content creators out there with that steady stream of income.
Rare moment where I will defend young guys. If you grew up online its more natural to seek out gratification from someone on-line, than to seek it out in-person, as my generation does. They grew up communicating on-line, so to them that's real. We didn't even use the phone. I lived with 29 other people, and we shared one phone. Face to face was real to us. Perception drives reality.
"No the real reason is because strip clubs increased pricing." No increased pricing here but the regulars have gone and have been replaced with guys wanting cheap food and to watch the stage. They don't even tip.
watching a webcam of a pretty girl is nice but lacking physical contact. i need that real touch of a pretty woman. spending money on an image is not satisfying to me.
You can look at the women of your preference on the internet, for the price of tolerating some ads. I don't generally have good conversations with strippers, they're usually not interested in what I think or know about. I often find them interesting when they're being genuine and talk about their thoughts and experiences. But you can also get that at lower cost too, read Stacey Keith's writings, watch stuff like "Soft White Underbelly" on the net. It's physical contact that's inevitably expensive, because it''s one on one, and the number of women who have a healthy, youthful appearance, and can tolerate lots of strangers touching them, is limited.
Different strokes (or lack thereof) for different folks I guess. Maybe the big appeal is if you get off on her role-playing submissiveness/obedience and thirstiness for you. And that you're interesting.
Camming fills a void mostly when you can't get to a club, and need a fix that is more refined than watching porn (you want some more direct/customized interaction).
IMO, camming and clubbing are complementary to each other, not mutually-exclusive activities.
Unless someone has a particularly interesting/unique style/look, it would be more difficult to build up a sizeable income from camming vs dancing.
It's like YouTube....sure, there are some YTers that are loaded, but most barely make enough to make it worthwhile even as a part-time gig.
My fav told me about a former dancer at her club, who seems to be banking on OF. She does shows in her car, parked in a mall parking lot. Apparently it's somehow hot that she could get caught if someone walked up next to the car.
16 comments
Upside: real girls might have to return to stripping, an IRL experience that cannot be replaced by tech. Of course we’ll need re-education camps to get those trained by institutions of higher indoctrination, I mean education, to learn to tolerate such patriarchal exploitation of woman-identifying peoples for carnal pleasures….
OTOH, she's competing with a Global supply of other hot babes, and there is still a demand of some physical interaction. IMO, somehow a happy equilibrium will occur with all the competing agendas out there.
Camming is more competitive, so the ability of white women to sell themselves as an upscale product to many men is a bigger advantage. So maybe camming is a big factor in the whole Clevon Little hey where the white women lament about strip clubs.
That said, the idea of giving money to some girl online that they will never meet, never have any real life interaction much less physical intimacy with, is both bizarre and pathetic at the same time. While I understand the need for these vast percentages of young men to at least have the illusion of some sort of relationship with a woman I still have to fault them for doing this. When there is endless amounts of free nudity and porn readily avaliable online, there really is no excuse for giving money to these lazy money grubbing do-nothings taking advantage of young men's loneliness and hopelessness. The young men need to man up and stop doing this.
People can deride real life strip clubs, prostitution, etc, as fake and pretend, but at least in that moment the customer is actually interacting with another real life person in the real world. Giving money to some fake pseudo-whore online for literally nothing is not just a sad commentary on how society is failing the young heterosexual male but also pathetic and embarrassing on the part of young men. They need to stop giving these girls money when porn is already free and ubiquitous, or conversely get out in the real world and go to actual strip clubs or real life prostitutes. Stop enabling this crap.
No increased pricing here but the regulars have gone and have been replaced with guys wanting cheap food and to watch the stage. They don't even tip.
Different strokes (or lack thereof) for different folks I guess. Maybe the big appeal is if you get off on her role-playing submissiveness/obedience and thirstiness for you. And that you're interesting.
IMO, camming and clubbing are complementary to each other, not mutually-exclusive activities.
Unless someone has a particularly interesting/unique style/look, it would be more difficult to build up a sizeable income from camming vs dancing.
It's like YouTube....sure, there are some YTers that are loaded, but most barely make enough to make it worthwhile even as a part-time gig.