Review tweaks
Papi_Chulo
Miami, FL (or the nearest big-booty club)
Looks like Founder has tweaked the review publishing - seems like a review now requires 7 total-votes instead of 5 and 4 up-votes instead of 3, to get published - e.g.:
https://www.tuscl.net/review.php?id=3645…
https://www.tuscl.net/review.php?id=3645…
Got something to say?
Start your own discussion
5 comments
I feel there is an advantage to approving reviews for clubs IDK - I notice if I know all the details of a club b/c I am very-familiar w/ that club, then at times I don't notice the review is missing a lot of club details that should be there for someone unfamiliar w/ the club; but since I know the club well/very-well, I may overlook the fact the review is missing a lot of details since I instinctively know those details.
If I read a review of a club IDK, then I'm in the position of a reader that doesn't know anything about the club and thus needs to be informed (which is how I see review-writing; i.e. that they should be written from the POV of someone that's never been to the club) - thus I am more apt to notice missing details that should be in the review - i.e. if I read a review of a club IDK and at the end of the review IDK what anything costs; how the dances are (mileage); or how the overall dancer-crew is, then IMO that is a bad/incomplete review that does not inform, and if I knew the club well I may not be aware how incomplete the review is since I subconsciously know that info.
When I reject a review of a club IDK, I don't do it b/c I think the info given is incorrect, I do it b/c there's a lot of info missing that me as someone unfamiliar w/ the club would like to know.