a better value than other SF clubs

For $50 you can get a topless dance with good mileage. A few of these dancers were gorgeous, but most were just average or slightly above average. I visited the big Sacramento club earlier same the evening and then drove 2 hours to SF. The difference was stark and noticeable: the girls at this SF club were definitely hotter than the ones at the Sacramento club. Most of the SF girls had natural tits, whereas in Sac the majority of them had fake boobs. The trade-off is that the SF girls were pierced and tattooed. Personally, I like piercings and tats, but I know that not everyone is into that kind of thing.

The basic problem with San Francisco is that most men can't afford the prices. The two clubs with the hottest girls (Hustler and Gold Club) mostly offer air dances with zero mileage. To get a decent dance with mileage you have to spend serious money. Centerfolds is a much better value, but it's all relative: I am fully aware that in other parts of the USA spending $50 on 1 song is an absolute rip-off. Welcome to Northern California!

Physically, the decor and furniture of the club itself is surprisingly upscale. The main room is small, but it doesn't feel like a dump. This is a nice place! It feels classy. The ratio of patrons to dancers, however, is lousy. Not many options to choose from. At 11pm on a Saturday night, it was packed and crowded with men, but not too many dancers. Luckily for me, I found 3 dancers who (on a 1 to 10 scale) I would personally consider 8s: C-cup natural tits, slender, attractive faces, nice ass. All 3 of them were cooperative with letting my hands touch almost everything. The only upside to have the club crowded with men and not enough dancers is that the girls weren't pushy and demanding dances. Nevertheless, I'd rather be in a club with too many dancers than not enough dancers. Also, none of these girls offered extras (HJ or BJ) so I have no idea if those are options here.