CLub O was pretty busy Saturday...

CLub O was pretty busy Saturday night. Parking was crowded and we should have taken our tip from the lot. Inside the main floor was about 60-70% full when we arrived around 11:30 pm. Cover remains at $10 per person for weekend nights. We remaine untl around 3 AM. Nothing about the club interior has changed from our last visit. Bouncer staff is still the same although it appeared they had a few more on hand that evening to handle the increased crowd size.

We tipped the bouncer and were seated in the raised VIP area to the left of the stage. We like it in that area because it allows us to view most of the room in addition to having a good view of the stage. Our usual seats have easy access via a stairway to the tip rail for when we want to go up and show our appreciation or attract a particular entertainer's attention. On this night we were seated next to a large group. We stayed there for about 10 minutes and then we moved to a table closer to the stage and more private by the bouncer staff. Our favorite bouncer, Kenney, stopped by to kiss my wife's hand and take his routine discrete but not so discrete peek down her dress as usual which is a nice touch that helps her feel more comfortable.

One thing we noticed right awas Saturday night was that there were many more entertainers and mostly new. In fact, as the night progressed, we realized that only 3-4 of the dancers there were ones we had seen before. There was also a serious upgrade in the costumes and dance quality from our last visit. (It was almost as if they had read our discussion on here and upped their game!) This was nice and we made sure to comment on it while at the club and also to send an email with comments to reinforce the changes.On Saturday night about 30 dancers were on hand. It was hard to judge because VIP was also busy as were the Flame Room ($30 totally nude lap dances) and the champagne rooms so there may have been more than 35 on hand. The variety of body types had also shifted. In the past, the majority of entertainers had been in shape but curvy. Not so Saturday night. The range varied greatly from nubile almost pre-pubescent to Ruebeneque in form. A couple were very attractive (8-9 range) but some were only 2-3's. One in particular had extremely garrish makeup, another looked like she had too much product in her hair and needed a shampoo. The energy level of the dancers while on stage was definitely higher than on previous visits perhaps because so many new dancers were jostling for roster position. Also, while the crowd was larger, it was soon evident that the majoriy were not buying private dances so dancers had to work harder for the few that were. (A lot of the crowd were cheap young 20 something males.)