TheSpectator

Whoever dies with the most debt wins!

As far as the legalities go, the main standard the US district court applied is there are enough sites to accommodate all the clubs in the permissible zone. The county claims 62 sites and the clubs claim 12. Thus the clubs can be forced to move. Doesn't matter that some of the landlords won't be interested or that they can overcharge for their new monopoly. The federal case is Maages auditorum v. PG county (who knew that SInsaysionals is really Maages auditorium?). It has been appealed to the 4th circuit in RIchmond, hopefully before more sympathetic judges.

This was not an effort to address legitimate complaints from people in residential areas close to strip clubs, contrary to the lie from the county spokesman. The goal was to shut down as many clubs as possible by using zoning to restrict them to areas zoned for industry. Some of the clubs are already in industrial areas (Mile High and Fuego to name two) but not in precisely the right type of zone so out they go. If this holds up the only one left will be Showcase, providing a fig leaf for the county to say they weren't just trying to put the clubs out of business. Good luck to anyone trying to get zoning approval to open a club in a permissible zone, you'll need it.

Until recently the club had gay male dancers on Sunday nights. That might not have been the hands-on action you were looking for :-)

Obvious shill, all top ratings, reviewer name is the club